Kolcaba R
Cuyahoga Community College, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
J Adv Nurs. 1997 Feb;25(2):290-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.1997025290.x.
Holistic thinking is so diverse that practically every theorist can claim holistic credentials. The challenge for nursing, then, is not whether holism but which holism? As a practice-centred discipline, nursing gives a central role to whole-person holism. In so far as nursing approximates medicine, it incorporates systemic holism. From its basis in biology, nursing imports organismic holism. The three holisms are, however, incompatible because the concepts of person, system and organism contrast in complex and interesting ways. Discussion of the contrasts reveals points of metaphysical, scientific and ethical incompatibility. A construct based on whole-person holism, but incorporating a partial synthesis of all three, reveals both promise and challenge for a unified holistic view in nursing.
整体思维是如此多样,以至于几乎每位理论家都可以宣称自己有整体论的资质。那么,护理面临的挑战不是是否采用整体论,而是采用哪种整体论?作为一门以实践为中心的学科,护理赋予全人整体论以核心地位。就护理与医学相近而言,它纳入了系统整体论。基于生物学基础,护理引入了机体整体论。然而,这三种整体论并不兼容,因为人、系统和机体的概念以复杂而有趣的方式相互对立。对这些对立的讨论揭示了形而上学、科学和伦理方面不兼容的要点。一种基于全人整体论,但融合了所有三种整体论部分内容的构想,为护理中的统一整体观既带来了希望,也带来了挑战。