Pinson P, Joos G, Watripont P, Brusselle G, Pauwels R
Department of Respiratory Diseases, University Hospital of Ghent, Belgium.
Respiration. 1997;64(1):102-7. doi: 10.1159/000196651.
Serum samples for the determination of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) levels were collected at diagnosis, after induction of chemotherapy and at relapse in order to assess the value of NSE in the diagnosis and management of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). At diagnosis, 47 of 64 patients with SCLC (73%) had abnormal NSE values (i.e. NSE > 12.5 micrograms/l). Mean NSE values were significantly higher in patients with extensive disease compared to limited disease. Patients with other malignancies or benign lung diseases presented with elevated NSE levels in approximately 15 and 4% of cases. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of positive results of NSE at diagnosis were 74, 83 and 71%, respectively, for a cutoff value of 12.5 micrograms/l. In responders mean NSE dropped significantly from 46.1 micrograms/l before chemotherapy to 17.0 micrograms/l after three cycles of chemotherapy. Nonresponders as a group showed a nonsignificant drop. At relapse mean NSE increased from 6.5 micrograms/l at the time of response to 51.9 micrograms/l at the time of progression, but in 5 of the 18 evaluable patients normal levels persisted. Thus, evolution of NSE in patients receiving chemotherapy correlated well with tumor volume in patients who responded, but often failed to predict a therapeutic outcome in patients with apparently chemoresistant tumor (i.e. some nonresponders showed a decrease in NSE levels). A similar lack of correlation between NSE levels and tumor volume was seen at the time of relapse. We conclude that the determination of NSE levels is of doubtful utility in the diagnosis and follow-up of SCLC patients.
为了评估神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)在小细胞肺癌(SCLC)诊断和管理中的价值,在诊断时、诱导化疗后以及复发时采集了用于测定NSE水平的血清样本。诊断时,64例SCLC患者中有47例(73%)NSE值异常(即NSE>12.5微克/升)。与局限性疾病患者相比,广泛性疾病患者的平均NSE值显著更高。其他恶性肿瘤或良性肺部疾病患者中,分别约有15%和4%的病例NSE水平升高。对于诊断时NSE阳性结果,当临界值为12.5微克/升时,敏感性、特异性和阳性预测值分别为74%、83%和71%。在有反应的患者中,平均NSE从化疗前的46.1微克/升显著降至三个化疗周期后的17.0微克/升。作为一个整体,无反应者的NSE下降不显著。复发时,平均NSE从反应时的6.5微克/升增加到进展时的51.9微克/升,但在18例可评估患者中有5例NSE水平持续正常。因此,接受化疗患者的NSE变化与有反应患者的肿瘤体积密切相关,但对于明显化疗耐药的肿瘤患者(即一些无反应者NSE水平下降),往往无法预测治疗结果。在复发时也观察到NSE水平与肿瘤体积之间缺乏类似的相关性。我们得出结论,测定NSE水平在SCLC患者的诊断和随访中的作用存疑。