Suppr超能文献

双功超声检查和血管造影在颈动脉疾病检查中的作用。

The role of duplex sonography and angiography in the investigation of carotid artery disease.

作者信息

Worthy S A, Henderson J, Griffiths P D, Oates C P, Gholkar A

机构信息

Department of Neuroradiology, Newcastle General Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

Neuroradiology. 1997 Feb;39(2):122-6. doi: 10.1007/s002340050378.

Abstract

Some patients with symptomatic carotid stenoses of greater than 70 % benefit from carotid endarterectomy. This study was designed to compare the accuracy of duplex ultrasound with angiography in assessing the degree of carotid stenosis in 73 patients with symptoms of recent carotid territory ischaemia. Ultrasound was found to be most accurate in the group of patients with normal vessels or mild stenoses (0-29 %) when there was 90 % concordance between ultrasound and angiography. Ultrasound was found to be least accurate in the group of patients with severe stenoses (70-99 %) in whom it was more likely to underestimate than to overestimate the degree of stenosis. Only one patient said to have < 30 % stenosis on ultrasonography had a > 70 % stenosis on IADSA. Our results indicate that patients with normal arteries or mild disease shown by ultrasound have a very small chance of having surgically amenable lesions in the neck. Ultrasound is reliable as an exclusory screening test. However, all other stenoses should also be investigated by catheter angiography if surgery is considered. Taking angiography as the reference, only 52 % of patients with severe stenoses, which might be taken as an indication for surgery, were correctly identified on ultrasonography. Ultrasound alone is a poor technique for identifying patients for surgery and a combination of ultrasound screening with angiography for > 30 % stenoses detected by ultrasound is recommended.

摘要

一些有症状且颈动脉狭窄超过70%的患者能从颈动脉内膜切除术获益。本研究旨在比较双功超声与血管造影术评估73例近期有颈动脉供血区缺血症状患者颈动脉狭窄程度的准确性。当血管正常或轻度狭窄(0 - 29%)的患者组中,超声与血管造影术有90%的一致性时,发现超声最为准确。在严重狭窄(70 - 99%)的患者组中,超声最不准确,在该组中它更可能低估而非高估狭窄程度。超声检查显示狭窄< 30%的患者中,仅1例在IADSA上显示狭窄> 70%。我们的结果表明,超声显示动脉正常或病变轻微的患者,颈部有手术可治疗病变的可能性非常小。超声作为一种排除性筛查试验是可靠的。然而,如果考虑手术,所有其他狭窄情况也应通过导管血管造影术进行检查。以血管造影术为参照,超声检查仅能正确识别52%可能被视为手术指征的严重狭窄患者。仅靠超声是一种较差的识别手术患者的技术,建议对超声检测出狭窄> 30%的患者采用超声筛查与血管造影术相结合的方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验