Fridén T, Roberts D, Zätterström R, Lindstrand A, Moritz U
Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1996;4(4):217-24. doi: 10.1007/BF01567966.
Proprioception of the knee was measured in 19 healthy individuals to evaluate whether there were any differences between extension and flexion movements from two different starting positions. The threshold before detecting a passive movement, visual estimation on a protractor of a passive change in position (30 degrees angular change) and active reproduction of the same angular change were registered. The reference population was tested twice to study normal variation and reproducibility, followed by the evaluation of 20 patients with chronic, symptomatic and unilateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knees. In the normal population no differences were found between the right and the left leg, men and women, or measurements made at the first and at the second test occasion. The thresholds from a starting position of 20 degrees were lower for extension than for flexion. When comparing the thresholds for extension between the 20 degrees and the 40 degrees starting position, lower values were found in the more extended position. The thresholds for flexion were lower from the 40 degrees starting position than from the 20 degrees starting position. The active reproduction of an angular change of 30 degrees was more accurate during flexion (30 degrees-60 degrees) than during extension (60 degrees-30 degrees). There were no differences in the reproduction tests or in thresholds from the 40 degrees starting position between the patients and the normal group, but the patients had higher thresholds from the 20 degrees starting position, in movements towards both extension 1.0 degree (range 0.5 degree-12.0 degrees) and flexion 1.5 degrees (range 0.5 degree-10.0 degrees) than the normal group 0.75 degree (range 0.5 degree-2.25 degrees) (P = 0.01) and 1.0 degree (range 0.5 degree-3.0 degrees) (P = 0.06), respectively. Thus, information of passive movements in the nearly extended knee position was more sensitive towards extension than towards flexion in threshold tests and the sensitivity improved closer to full extension, which implies a logical joint protective purpose. In this nearly extended knee position, which is the basis for most weight-bearing activities, patients with symptomatic ACL-deficient knees had an impaired awareness in detecting a passive movement. There were no differences in the more flexed position or in the reproduction tests between the patients and the normal group, and reproduction tests in the present form seem less appropriate to use in the evaluation of ACL injuries.
对19名健康个体的膝关节本体感觉进行了测量,以评估从两个不同起始位置进行伸展和屈曲运动之间是否存在差异。记录了检测被动运动前的阈值、用量角器对被动位置变化(30度角变化)的视觉估计以及相同角变化的主动再现。对参考人群进行了两次测试,以研究正常变异和可重复性,随后对20例患有慢性、有症状的单侧前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤膝关节的患者进行了评估。在正常人群中,左右腿、男性和女性之间,以及第一次和第二次测试时的测量结果均未发现差异。从20度起始位置开始,伸展的阈值低于屈曲的阈值。比较20度和40度起始位置之间的伸展阈值时,发现伸展程度越大,阈值越低。40度起始位置的屈曲阈值低于20度起始位置的屈曲阈值。30度角变化的主动再现在屈曲(30度-60度)时比伸展(60度-30度)时更准确。患者组和正常组在40度起始位置的再现测试或阈值方面没有差异,但患者组在20度起始位置朝着伸展1.0度(范围0.5度-12.0度)和屈曲1.5度(范围0.5度-10.0度)运动时的阈值高于正常组的0.75度(范围0.5度-2.25度)(P = 0.01)和1.0度(范围0.5度-3.0度)(P = 0.06)。因此,在阈值测试中,接近伸直膝关节位置的被动运动信息对伸展比对屈曲更敏感,并且在接近完全伸直时敏感性提高,这意味着一种合理的关节保护目的。在这个接近伸直的膝关节位置,这是大多数负重活动的基础,有症状的ACL损伤膝关节患者在检测被动运动时的感知受损。患者组和正常组在更屈曲位置或再现测试中没有差异,并且目前形式的再现测试似乎不太适合用于评估ACL损伤。