Friday G A, Khine H, Lin M S, Caliguiri L A
Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pennsylvania, USA.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1997 Feb;78(2):221-4. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63391-1.
Emergency department care for asthma is expensive and continuity of care is often inefficient. Identification of patients-at-risk for emergency treatment is required in order to intervene before visits to the emergency department.
To identify the antecedent factors in patients requiring emergency department treatment for wheezing and to determine the level of care before emergency visits.
A prospective survey of patients treated for wheezing in the emergency department of an academic children's hospital from January 1, 1994 to December 31, 1994. Data were compiled from a data from completed from the information obtained from the medical record, phone calls and letters.
During 1994, 1474 patients were treated for asthma and accounted for 1870 visits to the emergency department. Thirty-six percent of the total number of visits were made by 16% of the patients who made repeat visits. Two-thirds of the patients were 5 years of younger. Over 190 patients had been hospitalized for wheezing during the preceding 12-month period. Forty-four percent of the patients were referred to the emergency department by primary care physicians and 6.7% were referred by asthma specialists, either allergists or pulmonologists. The major predisposing factor was a family history of asthma in 70%. Beta agonists were the medications most frequently used prior to the emergency visits. Inhaled corticosteroids were used daily by 16% of the patients and oral corticosteroids were used daily by 7% of the patients.
Thirty-six percent of the visits were due to 16% of patients who were seen repeatedly in the emergency department for wheezing and a number of patients (192) had been admitted previously for wheezing. These findings suggest that there is a subset of patients who are known to have recurrent wheezing, but lack adequate management to avoid expensive hospital services. Very few of these patients were followed by asthma specialists and there was a marked underuse of anti-inflammatory drugs. This study characterized a subset of patients-at-risk for requiring emergency treatment for wheezing. There is a need to institute aggressive interventions to improve the quality of care and prevent costly emergency department visits.
哮喘的急诊科护理费用高昂,且护理的连续性往往效率低下。为了在患者前往急诊科就诊之前进行干预,需要识别有急诊治疗风险的患者。
识别因喘息而需要急诊科治疗的患者的前期因素,并确定急诊就诊前的护理水平。
对1994年1月1日至1994年12月31日在一家学术儿童医院急诊科接受喘息治疗的患者进行前瞻性调查。数据来自从病历、电话和信件中获取的信息所填写完成的数据。
1994年期间,1474例患者接受了哮喘治疗,共计1870次急诊科就诊。就诊总数的36%是由16%的进行复诊的患者产生的。三分之二的患者年龄在5岁以下。在之前的12个月期间,超过190例患者因喘息住院。44%的患者由初级保健医生转诊至急诊科,6.7%的患者由哮喘专科医生(过敏症专科医生或肺科医生)转诊。主要的诱发因素是70%的患者有哮喘家族史。β受体激动剂是急诊就诊前最常用的药物。16%的患者每天使用吸入性糖皮质激素,7%的患者每天使用口服糖皮质激素。
3