Cable R, Badon S, Pray C, Popovsky M A
American Red Cross Blood Services, Connecticut Region, Farmington, USA.
Transfusion. 1997 Feb;37(2):206-10. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1997.37297203525.x.
The introduction of hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening has significantly reduced the frequency of posttransfusion hepatitis C. To examine the current added value of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) screening, all donor screening at two large blood centers was reviewed.
From July 1991 through March 1994, 1,258,000 allogeneic blood donors were screened by enzyme immunoassay for anti-HCV: 343,000 donations by the first-generation test (HCV 1.0) and 915,000 donations by the second-generation test (HCV 2.0). Donations with positive EIA results were confirmed with a recombinant immunoblot assay.
Of these donors, 1,637 (0.13%) were confirmed as HCV-positive and 21,666 (1.72%) had elevated ALT. To estimate the additional margin of safety due to ALT screening, all donors who seroconverted were reviewed, and those donors who had elevated ALT but were HCV negative on a previous donation were identified. One hundred eleven HCV seroconversions were observed: 19 seroconversions from HCV 1.0-negative to HCV 1.0-confirmed-positive, 82 apparent seroconversions from HCV 1.0-negative to HCV 2.0-confirmed-positive, and 10 seroconversions from HCV 2.0-negative to HCV 2.0-confirmed-positive. The number of apparent HCV 1.0-negative to HCV 2.0-positive seroconversions was much greater than expected, which reflected the increased sensitivity of HCV 2.0. Only 15 donors were identified who had an elevated ALT on a previous HCV-negative blood donation, and all of these were among those who apparently seroconverted from HCV 1.0-negative to HCV 2.0-confirmed-positive. Out of the 10 HCV 2.0-seroconverting donors, no donor was found who was initially HCV 2.0 negative with elevated ALT and later was HCV 2.0 positive; nor were such donors found among 4 additional HCV 2.0-seroconverting donors.
With the introduction of HCV 2.0 screening. ALT appears to have little value as a surrogate test for hepatitis C, and ALT testing was unable to detect any donors who later seroconverted, as detected by HCV 2.0.
丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)筛查的引入显著降低了输血后丙型肝炎的发生率。为了评估目前丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)筛查的附加价值,我们回顾了两家大型血液中心的所有献血者筛查情况。
从1991年7月至1994年3月,1258000名异体献血者接受了酶免疫法抗HCV筛查:第一代检测(HCV 1.0)筛查了343000份献血,第二代检测(HCV 2.0)筛查了915000份献血。酶免疫测定结果为阳性的献血用重组免疫印迹法进行确认。
在这些献血者中,1637人(0.13%)被确认为HCV阳性,21666人(1.72%)ALT升高。为了评估ALT筛查带来的额外安全边际,我们回顾了所有血清学转换的献血者,并确定了那些ALT升高但之前献血时HCV阴性的献血者。观察到111例HCV血清学转换:19例从HCV 1.0阴性转为HCV 1.0确诊阳性,82例从HCV 1.0阴性转为HCV 2.0确诊阳性,10例从HCV 2.0阴性转为HCV 2.0确诊阳性。从HCV 1.0阴性到HCV 2.0阳性的明显血清学转换数量远高于预期,这反映了HCV 2.0检测灵敏度的提高。仅发现15名献血者之前的HCV阴性献血时ALT升高,且所有这些献血者都在那些从HCV 1.0阴性明显转为HCV 2.0确诊阳性的人群中。在10例HCV 2.0血清学转换的献血者中,未发现最初HCV 2.0阴性且ALT升高后来转为HCV 2.0阳性的献血者;在另外4例HCV 2.0血清学转换的献血者中也未发现此类献血者。
随着HCV 2.0筛查的引入,ALT作为丙型肝炎替代检测方法似乎价值不大,并且ALT检测未能检测出任何后来经HCV 2.0检测出现血清学转换的献血者。