Mazur D J, Hickam D H
Medical Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, OR 97201, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 1997 Feb;12(2):114-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.00016.x.
To assess the level of involvement patients want in decision making related to the acceptance or rejection of an invasive medical intervention and whether their preference for decision making is related to their preference for qualitative (verbal) or quantitative (numeric) information about the risks of the procedure.
A university-based Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center.
Cross-sectional study using structured interviews of consecutive patients seen for continuity care visits in a general medicine clinic.
Four hundred and sixty-seven consecutive patients with a mean age of 65.2 years (SD 10.70 years, range 31-88 years) and with a mean of 12.6 years (SD 2.96 years, range 0-24 years) of formal education.
In the context of an invasive diagnostic or therapeutic intervention, patients were asked whether they preferred patient-based, physician-based, or shared patient-physician decision making. Patients were asked to give the ratio of patient-to-physician decision making they preferred, and whether they preferred discussions using words, numbers, or both. Of 467 subjects, 318 (68%) preferred shared decision making; 100 (21.4%) preferred physician-based decision making; and 49 (10.5%) preferred patient-based decision making. In terms of risk disclosure, 436 (93.4%) preferred that their physician disclose risk information to them. Of these 436 patients, 42.7% preferred disclosure of information about the probability of adverse outcomes using qualitative (verbal) expressions of probability; 35.7% preferred disclosure in terms of quantitative (numeric) expressions of probability; and 9.8% preferred disclosure in both qualitative and quantitative terms. Younger patients (odds ratio [OR] 0.96; confidence interval [CI] 0.93, 0.99), patients who had at least one stroke (OR 3.03; CI 1.03, 8.90), and patients who preferred to discuss risk information with their physicians in terms of numbers (OR 2.39; CI 1.40, 4.06) tended to prefer patient-based or shared decision making.
Male veterans consistently preferred shared patient-physician decision making in the context of invasive medical interventions.
评估患者在接受或拒绝侵入性医疗干预相关决策中希望参与的程度,以及他们对决策方式的偏好是否与其对手术风险的定性(文字)或定量(数字)信息的偏好相关。
一所大学附属的退伍军人事务医疗中心。
采用横断面研究,对在普通内科门诊接受连续性护理就诊的连续患者进行结构化访谈。
467名连续患者,平均年龄65.2岁(标准差10.70岁,范围31 - 88岁),平均正规教育年限12.6年(标准差2.96年,范围0 - 24年)。
在侵入性诊断或治疗干预的背景下,询问患者他们更喜欢基于患者、基于医生还是患者与医生共同参与的决策方式。要求患者给出他们更喜欢的患者与医生决策的比例,以及他们更喜欢用文字、数字还是两者结合进行讨论。在467名受试者中,318名(68%)更喜欢共同决策;100名(21.4%)更喜欢基于医生的决策;49名(10.5%)更喜欢基于患者的决策。在风险披露方面,436名(93.4%)患者希望他们的医生向他们披露风险信息。在这436名患者中,42.7%更喜欢用概率的定性(文字)表述来披露不良结果的概率信息;35.7%更喜欢用概率的定量(数字)表述来披露;9.8%更喜欢用定性和定量两种方式披露。年轻患者(优势比[OR]0.96;置信区间[CI]0.93,0.99)、至少有过一次中风的患者(OR 3.03;CI 1.03,8.90)以及更喜欢用数字与医生讨论风险信息的患者(OR 2.39;CI 1.40,4.06)倾向于更喜欢基于患者或共同参与的决策方式。
男性退伍军人在侵入性医疗干预的背景下一直更喜欢患者与医生共同参与决策。