Biederman I, Gerhardstein P C, Cooper E E, Nelson C A
Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles 90089-2520, USA.
Neuropsychologia. 1997 Mar;35(3):271-87. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(96)00075-9.
Seven individuals with unilateral anterior inferior temporal (AIT) lobectomies performed two types of shape recognition tasks with line drawing of 3D objects briefly presented in either the left or the right visual field. In one task, subjects named familiar objects in a name priming paradigm. In the other task, subjects judged whether two objects, presented sequentially with an intervening mask, were the same or different in shape, disregarding differences in orientation of up to 60 degrees in depth. They could not use names or basic level concepts to do the matching as the stimuli were either nonsense objects or, if familiar objects, were of same name-different-shaped exemplars on different trials. The disadvantage of presenting an image to the lobectomized hemisphere was negligible in both tasks. Two non-exclusive possibilities are suggested by this result: (a) Object recognition is completed posterior to AIT, likely at the temporal-occipital boundary, with no deleterious retrograde effects on object recognition from the AIT section, or (b) Callosal transfer of object information prior to AIT is completely efficient. These results, along with results of single unit recording and lesion experiments in the monkey, PET and MRI imaging in humans, and a plausibility argument based on the pattern of callosal connections suggest both are correct. Rather than mediating real-time object recognition, AIT may code representations for visual episodes and scenes.
七名接受单侧颞叶前下部(AIT)切除术的患者,对短暂呈现于左视野或右视野中的三维物体线条图执行两种形状识别任务。在一项任务中,受试者在名称启动范式下说出熟悉物体的名称。在另一项任务中,受试者判断两个依次呈现并带有间隔掩蔽的物体在形状上是否相同,忽略深度方向上高达60度的方向差异。由于刺激物要么是无意义物体,要么如果是熟悉物体,则在不同试验中是同名但形状不同的示例,所以他们无法使用名称或基本水平概念来进行匹配。在两项任务中,向切除叶半球呈现图像的劣势都可忽略不计。这一结果提示了两种并非相互排斥的可能性:(a)物体识别在AIT后方完成,可能在颞枕边界,AIT切除对物体识别没有有害的逆行效应,或者(b)在AIT之前物体信息的胼胝体传递是完全有效的。这些结果,连同猴子的单神经元记录和损伤实验结果、人类的PET和MRI成像结果,以及基于胼胝体连接模式的合理性论证,表明两者都是正确的。AIT可能并不介导实时物体识别,而是编码视觉事件和场景的表征。