Harada K, Rice M J, McDonald R W, Shiota T, Ishii M, Reller M D, Sahn D J
Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon 97201-3098, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 1997 Feb 15;79(4):442-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00783-7.
To assess ventricular diastolic filling in fetuses with constriction of ducts arterious, 43 fetuses of pregnant women receiving indomethacin (100 to 150 mg/day) were examined with Doppler echocardiography. Ductal constriction occurred in 21 fetuses, defined as maximal systolic velocity > 140 cm/s and diastolic flow velocity > 30 cm/s. The variables measured to assess diastolic function were peak velocity during early diastole (peak E wave), peak velocity during atrial contraction (peak A wave), and the velocity ratio (peak E/A ratio); these were compared to maximal ductal flow velocity during systole and diastole. The mitral peak E wave, peak A wave, and peak E/A ratio in fetuses with ductal constriction showed no significant difference from those in fetuses without ductal constriction. In fetuses with ductal constriction, the tricuspid A wave increased significantly without changes in the peak E wave (57 +/- 9 vs 50 +/- 6 cm/s, p < 0.01) and the peak E/A ratio was significantly lower than in fetuses without ductal constriction (0.57 +/- 0.10 vs 0.65 +/- 0.08, p < 0.05). In 9 fetuses with ductal constriction, we compared the Doppler tricuspid E wave, A wave, and E/A ratio during indomethacin administration with those after withdrawal of the drug for a mean of 24 hours. Both systolic and diastolic ductal flow velocities in the fetuses returned to normal range after discontinuation of indomethacin. The tricuspid peak A wave decreased (59 +/- 9 vs 50 +/- 11 cm/s) and the E/ A ratio increased significantly (0.56 +/- 0.07 vs 0.69 +/- 0.07) (both p < 0.01) without any significant change in peak E wave after discontinuation of indomethacin. This study suggests that ductal constriction influences Doppler patterns of right ventricular diastolic filling. These changes could be related to the increased afterload presented to the right ventricle which might affect diastolic function.
为评估动脉导管狭窄胎儿的心室舒张期充盈情况,对43例接受吲哚美辛(100至150毫克/天)治疗的孕妇所怀胎儿进行了多普勒超声心动图检查。21例胎儿出现导管狭窄,定义为最大收缩期速度>140厘米/秒且舒张期血流速度>30厘米/秒。用于评估舒张功能的测量变量为舒张早期峰值速度(E峰峰值)、心房收缩期峰值速度(A峰峰值)以及速度比值(E/A峰峰值比值);将这些变量与收缩期和舒张期最大导管血流速度进行比较。动脉导管狭窄胎儿的二尖瓣E峰峰值、A峰峰值及E/A峰峰值比值与无导管狭窄胎儿相比无显著差异。在动脉导管狭窄胎儿中,三尖瓣A峰显著增加,而E峰峰值无变化(57±9与50±6厘米/秒,p<0.01),且E/A峰峰值比值显著低于无导管狭窄胎儿(0.57±0.10与0.65±0.08,p<0.05)。在9例动脉导管狭窄胎儿中,我们比较了吲哚美辛给药期间及停药平均24小时后的多普勒三尖瓣E峰、A峰及E/A峰峰值比值。停用吲哚美辛后,胎儿的收缩期和舒张期导管血流速度均恢复至正常范围。停用吲哚美辛后,三尖瓣A峰峰值降低(59±9与50±11厘米/秒),E/A峰峰值比值显著增加(0.56±0.07与0.69±0.07)(均p<0.01),而E峰峰值无显著变化。本研究表明,导管狭窄会影响右心室舒张期充盈的多普勒模式。这些变化可能与右心室后负荷增加有关,而后负荷增加可能会影响舒张功能。