Bakris G L, Mangrum A, Copley J B, Vicknair N, Sadler R
Department of Medicine, Ochsner Clinic, New Orleans, La, USA.
Hypertension. 1997 Mar;29(3):744-50. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.29.3.744.
beta-Blockers are known to slow the progression of diabetic nephropathy by lowering arterial pressure. Moreover, in individuals with diabetic nephropathy, antihypertensive agents that provide sustained reductions in proteinuria slow the rate of decline in renal function compared with agents without this antiproteinuric effect. To examine whether differential effects on proteinuria affect the progression of diabetic nephropathy, we conducted a randomized study that compared the effects of a heart rate-lowering calcium channel blocker, sustained-release verapamil, with those of a beta-blocker, atenolol, on the progression of diabetic renal disease. The primary end point of the study was a change in creatinine clearance slope. Thirty-four African Americans with the following inclusion criteria were randomized to one of the two groups: serum creatinine greater than 1.4 mg/dL, proteinuria greater than 1500 mg/d, longer than a 5-year history of both non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and hypertension, and exclusion of other renal diseases. Goal blood pressure was less than 140/90 mm Hg. All subjects received loop diuretics as second line agents to help achieve the blood pressure goal. Twenty-four-hour urinary protein and sodium excretions as well as creatinine clearance were measured at 6-month intervals. Blood pressure was measured every 3 months. After a mean follow-up of 54+/-6 months, the calcium channel blocker group demonstrated both a slower rate of decline in creatinine clearance (-1.7+/-0.9 versus -3.7+/-1.4 mL/min per year per 1.73 m2, P<.01) and a greater reduction in proteinuria compared with the atenolol group. Additionally, a greater proportion of the atenolol group had a 50% or more increase in serum creatinine compared with the verapamil group (32+/-9% versus 16+/-7%, P<.05). These between-group differences could not be explained by differences in blood pressure control. These data support the concept that antihypertensive agents that persistently maintain reductions in both arterial pressure and proteinuria slow the progression of diabetic renal disease in African Americans to a greater extent than those agents without these effects.
已知β受体阻滞剂可通过降低动脉压来减缓糖尿病肾病的进展。此外,在糖尿病肾病患者中,与无降蛋白尿作用的药物相比,能持续降低蛋白尿的抗高血压药物可减缓肾功能下降速度。为了研究对蛋白尿的不同影响是否会影响糖尿病肾病的进展,我们进行了一项随机研究,比较了降心率的钙通道阻滞剂缓释维拉帕米与β受体阻滞剂阿替洛尔对糖尿病肾病进展的影响。该研究的主要终点是肌酐清除率斜率的变化。34名符合以下纳入标准的非裔美国人被随机分为两组:血清肌酐大于1.4mg/dL、蛋白尿大于1500mg/d、非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病和高血压病史超过5年,且排除其他肾脏疾病。目标血压低于140/90mmHg。所有受试者均接受襻利尿剂作为二线药物以帮助实现血压目标。每6个月测量一次24小时尿蛋白、尿钠排泄量以及肌酐清除率。每3个月测量一次血压。经过平均54±6个月的随访,与阿替洛尔组相比,钙通道阻滞剂组的肌酐清除率下降速度较慢(每年每1.73m²为-1.7±0.9 vs -3.7±1.4mL/min,P<0.01),且蛋白尿减少幅度更大。此外,与维拉帕米组相比,阿替洛尔组中有更大比例的患者血清肌酐升高50%或更多(32±9% vs 16±7%,P<0.05)。这些组间差异无法用血压控制的差异来解释。这些数据支持这样一种观点,即持续维持动脉压和蛋白尿降低的抗高血压药物比无这些作用的药物能更大程度地减缓非裔美国人糖尿病肾病的进展。