Iabichella M L, Dell'Omo G, Melillo E, Pedrinelli R
Reparto di Medicina Interna, Laboratorio Microcircolatorio, Azienda Ospedaliera Pisana.
Hypertension. 1997 Mar;29(3):751-6. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.29.3.751.
The aim of this work was to test whether calcium channel blockers interfere with skin vasoconstrictor reflexes that minimize postural increases in capillary pressure and avoid fluid extravasation and eventually subcutaneous edema. Studies were conducted in 23 untreated mild to moderate essential hypertensives; drugs, either calcium channel blockers or not, were given for 2 weeks according to a crossover, sequence-randomized design. Skin blood flow was measured by laser Doppler flowmetry in two skin areas: (1) the dorsum of the foot, where arteriovenous anastomoses are poorly represented, and (2) the plantar surface of the great toe, where those anastomoses are predominant. Determinations were obtained both with the foot at heart level and with it placed passively 50 cm below the heart level; percent flow changes from the horizontal to the dependent position were the measure of postural vasoconstriction. Two dihydropyridine derivatives, amlodipine (10 mg UID) and nifedipine (60 mg UID), and verapamil (240 mg BID), a chemically unrelated compound, diminished to similar extents the postural fall in skin blood flow at the dorsum of the foot. Blockade of alpha1-adrenergic and AT-1 subtype angiotensin II receptors by doxazosin (4 mg UID) and losartan (50 mg UID), respectively, exerted no effect. Postural skin blood flow responses at the plantar surface of the great toe were unmodified during the pharmacological trials. Thus, calcium channel blockers of different chemical origins antagonized postural skin vasoconstriction at the dorsum of the foot. The data indicate altered postural capillary blood flow regulation, since arteriovenous anastomoses are anatomically absent at this site; the effect was independent of either alpha1-adrenoceptor or angiotensin II receptor antagonism. Interference with skin postural vasoconstrictor mechanisms may result in net filtration of fluid to the extravascular compartment. This mechanism might explain the as yet unknown pathogenesis of ankle edema during treatment with calcium antagonists.
这项研究的目的是测试钙通道阻滞剂是否会干扰皮肤血管收缩反射,这种反射可将姿势改变引起的毛细血管压力升高降至最低,并避免液体外渗及最终形成皮下水肿。研究对象为23名未经治疗的轻度至中度原发性高血压患者;根据交叉、序列随机设计,给予药物(钙通道阻滞剂或其他药物)治疗2周。通过激光多普勒血流仪在两个皮肤区域测量皮肤血流量:(1)足背,此处动静脉吻合较少;(2)拇趾跖面,此处动静脉吻合较多。分别在足部与心脏水平齐平以及被动放置于心脏水平以下50 cm处进行测定;从水平位到下垂位的血流百分比变化作为姿势性血管收缩的指标。两种二氢吡啶衍生物氨氯地平(10 mg每日一次)和硝苯地平(60 mg每日一次)以及化学结构不相关的维拉帕米(240 mg每日两次),在降低足背皮肤血流量的姿势性下降方面作用程度相似。多沙唑嗪(4 mg每日一次)和氯沙坦(50 mg每日一次)分别阻断α1肾上腺素能受体和AT - 1亚型血管紧张素II受体,未产生作用。在药物试验期间,拇趾跖面的姿势性皮肤血流反应未改变。因此,不同化学来源的钙通道阻滞剂均可拮抗足背的姿势性皮肤血管收缩。数据表明姿势性毛细血管血流调节发生改变,因为该部位在解剖学上不存在动静脉吻合;这种作用与α1肾上腺素能受体或血管紧张素II受体拮抗无关。干扰皮肤姿势性血管收缩机制可能导致液体向血管外间隙的净滤过。这一机制可能解释了钙拮抗剂治疗期间踝部水肿尚未明确的发病机制。