Cox J L, Lee E, Langer A, Armstrong P W, Naylor C D
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences in Ontario, North York.
CMAJ. 1997 Feb 15;156(4):497-505.
To characterize the extent of delay in administration of thrombolytic therapy to patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in Canada, to examine patient-specific predictors of such delay and to measure the effect of delay on short-term nonfatal cardiac outcomes.
Secondary cohort analysis of data from the first international Global Utilization of Streptokinase and tPA for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO-I) trial.
Sixty-three acute care hospitals across Canada.
All 2898 Canadian patients with an AMI enrolled in GUSTO-I.
Time before arrival at a hospital ("symptom-to-door" time) and time from arrival to administration of therapy ("door-to-needle" time) for patients who had an AMI outside of a hospital, in clinically relevant categories; proportions of patients with nonfatal, serious cardiac events, including shock, sustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation and asystole.
Of the total number of patients enrolled, records were complete for 2708; 2542 of these patients (93.9%) had an AMI outside of a hospital. These 2542 patients presented a median 81 (interquartile range 50 to 130) minutes after the onset of symptoms, and the median time to treatment in hospital was 85 (interquartile range 61 to 115) minutes. Whereas a greater proportion of Canadian patients than of patients enrolled in GUSTO-I in other countries reached hospital within 2 hours of symptom onset (71.5% v. 61.2%, p < 0.001), a greater proportion of Canadian patients experienced in-hospital treatment delays of more than 1 hour (75.3% v. 57.1%, p < 0.001). In an analysis of all 2708 patients with complete records, both the unadjusted and adjusted odds of nonfatal cardiac events for those treated 4 to 6 hours after symptom onset were significantly higher than for those treated within 2 hours (odds ratio 1.60, 95% confidence interval 1.09 to 2.37).
After arrival at a hospital, Canadian patients enrolled in GUSTO-I received thrombolytic therapy more slowly than trial enrollees in other countries. Such delays are already known to decrease the rate of short-term survival after AMI. The findings further show that long time to treatment also increases the odds of nonfatal, serious cardiac events. Hospitals and physicians caring for patients with AMI should routinely assess whether and how they can improve door-to-needle times.
描述加拿大急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者接受溶栓治疗的延迟程度,研究此类延迟的患者特异性预测因素,并衡量延迟对短期非致命性心脏结局的影响。
对首个国际心肌梗死溶栓治疗全球应用(GUSTO-I)试验的数据进行二次队列分析。
加拿大的63家急症医院。
GUSTO-I试验中纳入的所有2898例加拿大AMI患者。
在临床上相关分类中,院外发生AMI的患者到达医院前的时间(“症状到入院”时间)以及从入院到接受治疗的时间(“入院到用药”时间);发生非致命性严重心脏事件(包括休克、持续性室性心动过速、心室颤动和心搏停止)的患者比例。
在纳入的患者总数中,2708例患者的记录完整;其中2542例患者(93.9%)院外发生AMI。这2542例患者在症状发作后中位81分钟(四分位间距50至130分钟)就诊,在医院的中位治疗时间为85分钟(四分位间距61至115分钟)。与GUSTO-I试验中其他国家的患者相比,更多加拿大患者在症状发作后2小时内到达医院(71.5%对61.2%,p<0.001),但更多加拿大患者在医院的治疗延迟超过1小时(75.3%对57.1%,p<0.001)。在对所有2708例记录完整的患者进行的分析中,症状发作后4至6小时接受治疗的患者发生非致命性心脏事件的未调整和调整后的比值均显著高于2小时内接受治疗的患者(比值比1.60,95%置信区间1.09至2.37)。
在到达医院后,参与GUSTO-I试验的加拿大患者接受溶栓治疗的速度比其他国家的试验参与者慢。已知此类延迟会降低AMI后的短期生存率。研究结果进一步表明,较长的治疗时间也会增加发生非致命性严重心脏事件的几率。治疗AMI患者的医院和医生应常规评估他们是否以及如何能够缩短入院到用药时间。