• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术在复发性食管癌治疗中的作用。

Role of surgery in the treatment of recurrent esophageal cancer.

作者信息

Carlini S, Grauso F, Perri P, Pasquali Lasagni R, Piarulli L, Cavallari A, Bruno P, Benaglia A, Cerasoli V, Campioni N

机构信息

Third Department of Surgery, Regina Elena Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Hepatogastroenterology. 1997 Jan-Feb;44(13):187-91.

PMID:9058142
Abstract

Neoplastic recurrence is the most common cause of death after surgery for esophageal cancer. The Authors review the therapeutic options evaluating in terms of palliation of dysphagia and complication and mortality rates. Prognostic factors and mechanisms determining the recurrence are also reviewed. A strategy for a rational approach in the management of recurrent esophageal cancer emerges from both the literature and their own experience. Notwithstanding the small life span of these patients, the treatment of esophageal obstruction is mandatory. The therapeutic options that be considered are: palliative resection, surgical bypass, laser therapy, intubation, radiotherapy. The site of obstruction, the presence of metastasis, the general status can lead to the optimal choice. In terms of palliation of dysphagia the surgical approach seems to obtain the best results, even if high complication and mortality rates have been reported. Bypass is the second surgical choice when applicable. The other non-surgical modalities have been administered in large series of patients with good results. Combination therapies can obtain better results.

摘要

肿瘤复发是食管癌手术后最常见的死亡原因。作者回顾了从吞咽困难缓解、并发症及死亡率方面评估的治疗选择。还回顾了决定复发的预后因素及机制。从文献及自身经验中得出了一种合理治疗复发性食管癌的策略。尽管这些患者生存期短,但治疗食管梗阻是必要的。可考虑的治疗选择有:姑息性切除、手术旁路、激光治疗、插管、放疗。梗阻部位、转移情况、一般状况可导向最佳选择。在缓解吞咽困难方面,手术方法似乎能取得最佳效果,即便已有报道称其并发症和死亡率高。适用时,旁路是第二种手术选择。其他非手术方式已应用于大量患者并取得良好效果。联合治疗可取得更好效果。

相似文献

1
Role of surgery in the treatment of recurrent esophageal cancer.手术在复发性食管癌治疗中的作用。
Hepatogastroenterology. 1997 Jan-Feb;44(13):187-91.
2
[Endoscopic palliation of dysphagia due to anastomotic recurrences after esophageal surgery and total gastrectomy due to carcinoma].[因食管癌行食管手术及全胃切除术后吻合口复发所致吞咽困难的内镜下姑息治疗]
Minerva Chir. 1998 Oct;53(10):781-5.
3
Nd-YAG laser, a new palliative alternative in the management of esophageal cancer.
Endoscopy. 1983 Nov;15(6):353-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1021554.
4
Causes and treatment of recurrent dysphagia after self-expanding metal stent placement for palliation of esophageal carcinoma.食管癌姑息性自膨式金属支架置入术后复发性吞咽困难的原因及治疗
Endoscopy. 2004 Oct;36(10):880-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-825855.
5
Palliation of malignant dysphagia in esophageal cancer: a literature-based review.食管癌恶性吞咽困难的姑息治疗:基于文献的综述
J Support Oncol. 2006 Sep;4(8):365-73, 379.
6
Palliative Treatment of Esophageal Cancer.食管癌的姑息治疗
Semin Radiat Oncol. 1994 Jul;4(3):202-214. doi: 10.1053/SRAO00400192.
7
Role of photodynamic therapy in unresectable esophageal and lung cancer.光动力疗法在不可切除食管癌和肺癌中的作用。
Lasers Surg Med. 2006 Jun;38(5):396-402. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20364.
8
Effect of stent size on complications and recurrent dysphagia in patients with esophageal or gastric cardia cancer.支架尺寸对食管癌或贲门癌患者并发症及复发性吞咽困难的影响。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Apr;65(4):592-601. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.12.018.
9
New design esophageal stents for the palliation of dysphagia from esophageal or gastric cardia cancer: a randomized trial.用于缓解食管癌或贲门癌吞咽困难的新型设计食管支架:一项随机试验。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Feb;103(2):304-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01542.x. Epub 2007 Sep 25.
10
Palliative therapy.姑息治疗。
J Surg Oncol. 2005 Dec 1;92(3):246-56. doi: 10.1002/jso.20366.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcome for malignant tracheobronchial stenoses in esophageal cancer.
Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002 Jun;50(6):231-4. doi: 10.1007/BF03032150.