Schoenen J
Department of Neurology, University of Liège, Belgium.
Neurol Clin. 1997 Feb;15(1):85-105. doi: 10.1016/s0733-8619(05)70296-6.
Methods of clinical neurophysiology are of little use for the diagnosis of headache disorders. They are, however, invaluable tools for a better understanding of the pathophysiology of functional headaches. They are traumatic, able to explore simple or more complex neural activities, and to some extent capable of reflecting activity in certain neurotransmitter systems as well as the action of pharmacologic agents on the CNS. This article reviews the interest and limits of electroencephalography, evoked potentials, electromyography, and nocifensive reflexes in primary headaches. Because neurophysiologic methods are no more than indirect means of looking into the "black box," their results need to be interpreted with caution and, whenever possible, should be compared in the same study with clinical behavioral and biochemical data.
临床神经生理学方法对头痛疾病的诊断用处不大。然而,它们是深入了解功能性头痛病理生理学的宝贵工具。它们具有创伤性,能够探索简单或更复杂的神经活动,并且在一定程度上能够反映某些神经递质系统的活动以及药物制剂对中枢神经系统的作用。本文综述了脑电图、诱发电位、肌电图和伤害性反射在原发性头痛中的作用及局限性。由于神经生理学方法不过是探究“黑匣子”的间接手段,其结果需要谨慎解读,并且只要有可能,应在同一研究中与临床行为和生化数据进行比较。