Pezdek K, Roe C
Department of Psychology, Claremont Graduate School, CA 91711-3955, USA.
Law Hum Behav. 1997 Feb;21(1):95-106. doi: 10.1023/a:1024870127516.
Investigates recent claims that it is relatively easy to suggestively plant false memories in children, by comparing the relative vulnerability to suggestibility of changed, planted, and erased memories. 80 4-year-olds and 80 10-year-olds either were touched in a specific way or were not touched at all, and it was later suggested that a different touch, a completely new touch, or no touch at all had occurred. The suggestibility effect occurred only in the changed memory condition; the difference between the experimental changed condition and the corresponding control condition was significant. In the planted and erased memory conditions no suggestibility effect occurred; there was no significant reduction in the experimental groups relative to the corresponding control conditions. Thus, although it is relatively easy to suggest to a child a change in an event that was experienced, it is less likely that an event can be planted in or erased from memory. It is thus inappropriate to provide courtroom testimony regarding the probability of suggestively planting false memories based on the classic suggestibility research, which has largely been restricted to the study of suggestively changing memories.
通过比较改变、植入和消除记忆对暗示性的相对易感性,研究最近关于在儿童中暗示性植入虚假记忆相对容易的说法。80名4岁儿童和80名10岁儿童要么以特定方式被触摸,要么根本未被触摸,随后有人暗示发生了不同的触摸、全新的触摸或根本没有触摸。暗示性效应仅在改变记忆的条件下出现;实验性改变条件与相应对照条件之间的差异具有显著性。在植入和消除记忆的条件下未出现暗示性效应;实验组相对于相应对照条件没有显著降低。因此,虽然向儿童暗示其经历过的事件发生了改变相对容易,但事件被植入记忆或从记忆中消除的可能性较小。因此,基于经典的暗示性研究提供关于暗示性植入虚假记忆可能性的法庭证词是不合适的,经典研究主要限于对暗示性改变记忆的研究。