• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy as an alternative to abdominal hysterectomy in patients with fibroids.

作者信息

Schneider A, Merker A, Martin C, Michels W, Krause N

机构信息

Department of Gynecology, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.

出版信息

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 1997;259(2):79-85. doi: 10.1007/BF02505313.

DOI:10.1007/BF02505313
PMID:9059748
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Introduction of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) was evaluated for its usefulness to replace abdominal hysterectomy in fibroids.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 240 women with a mean age of 46.7 years underwent hysterectomy over a period of one year. The technique of LAVH was introduced starting in the second quarter of the study period. Clinical data of 60 patients undergoing either LAVH or abdominal hysterectomy for fibroids were compared in a cross-sectional study by chi 2- and t-test.

RESULTS

A comparison between the first and the last quarter of the study period showed that the rate of abdominal hysterectomies decreased from 66% to 12%, whereas LAVH increased from 0 to 40% (p < 0.05). The rate of vaginal hysterectomies remained between 34% and 48%. Compared to abdominal hysterectomy, LAVH operating time was about 1/3 longer, hospital stay was shorter (3 days), and LAVH proved more cost-effective than abdominal hysterectomy (significance of all differences: p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

LAVH is a valid alternative to abdominal hysterectomy in fibroids.

摘要

相似文献

1
Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy as an alternative to abdominal hysterectomy in patients with fibroids.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 1997;259(2):79-85. doi: 10.1007/BF02505313.
2
Identifying the indications for laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a prospective, randomised comparison with abdominal hysterectomy in patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids.确定腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术的适应证:对有症状子宫肌瘤患者进行的一项前瞻性、与腹式子宫切除术的随机对照比较。
BJOG. 2000 May;107(5):620-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb13303.x.
3
Total abdominal hysterectomy versus laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total vaginal hysterectomy.全腹子宫切除术与腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术与全阴道子宫切除术的比较
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2011 Nov;4(4):161-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-5910.2011.00104.x. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
4
Randomized comparison of total laparoscopic, laparoscopically assisted vaginal and vaginal hysterectomies for myomatous uteri.子宫肌瘤患者行全腹腔镜、腹腔镜辅助阴式和阴式子宫切除术的随机对照比较。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Sep;290(3):485-91. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3228-2. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
5
A comparative study among laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy, vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy: experience in a tertiary care hospital in Bangladesh.腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术、阴式子宫切除术和腹式子宫切除术的比较研究:孟加拉国一家三级医院的经验
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;31(3):254-7. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2010.550346.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis of the treatment of large leiomyomas: laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy.大子宫肌瘤治疗的成本效益分析:腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术与腹式子宫切除术的比较
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 May;196(5):e19-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.12.029.
7
[Operative approaches, indications, and medical economics evaluation of 4180 cases of hysterectomy].[4180例子宫切除术的手术方式、适应证及医学经济学评价]
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2003 Aug;25(4):406-9.
8
Laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH)--an alternative to abdominal hysterectomy.腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术(LAVH)——腹式子宫切除术的替代方法。
Singapore Med J. 2002 Mar;43(3):138-42.
9
Clinical and financial analyses of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy.腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术与腹式子宫切除术的临床及财务分析
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1994 Aug;1(4 Pt 1):357-61. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)80801-1.
10
Laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for fibroid uteri weighing at least 500 grammes.腹腔镜辅助下对重量至少500克的子宫肌瘤行阴式子宫切除术。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 May;39(2):182-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1999.tb03367.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Body Mass Index and Its Role in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.体重指数及其在全腹腔镜子宫切除术中的作用。
Int Sch Res Notices. 2014 Oct 28;2014:787604. doi: 10.1155/2014/787604. eCollection 2014.
2
Costs and effects of abdominal versus laparoscopic hysterectomy: systematic review of controlled trials.经腹腔镜与经腹子宫切除术的成本与效果比较:对照试验的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2009 Oct 5;4(10):e7340. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007340.
3
Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: cohort review of patients with uterine neoplasia.
全腹腔镜子宫切除术与经腹全子宫切除术:子宫肿瘤患者队列回顾
JSLS. 2005 Jul-Sep;9(3):277-86.
4
Laparoscopic assistance after vaginal hysterectomy and unsuccessful access to the ovaries or failed uterine mobilization: changing trends.经阴道子宫切除术后腹腔镜辅助及卵巢暴露失败或子宫活动度欠佳:变化趋势
JSLS. 2004 Oct-Dec;8(4):339-46.
5
Cost effectiveness analysis of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with standard hysterectomy: results from a randomised trial.腹腔镜子宫切除术与标准子宫切除术的成本效益分析:一项随机试验的结果
BMJ. 2004 Jan 17;328(7432):134. doi: 10.1136/bmj.37942.601331.EE. Epub 2004 Jan 7.