Costanzo M R, Koch D M, Fisher S G, Heroux A L, Kao W G, Johnson M R
Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplant Program, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 1997 Feb;16(2):169-78.
In heart transplant recipients methotrexate has been shown to reverse recurrent/persistent acute rejection refractory to intensified conventional immunosuppression. This study sought to determine whether methotrexate produces a sustained decline of heart allograft rejection rates and renders rejection rates of patients with a history of recurrent/persistent rejection similar to those of heart transplant recipients without such history.
Rejection, infection, and cardiac allograft vasculopathy were compared in 35 patients treated with methotrexate (12 +/- 9 mg/week for 34 +/- 54 weeks) and 236 patients never given methotrexate. Because the mean time from transplantation to initiation of methotrexate was 9.4 months, patients treated without methotrexate were analyzed for events < or = 9.4 versus > 9.4 months after heart transplantation.
Demographics, perioperative and maintenance immunosuppression, and postoperative follow-up time (58 +/- 32 vs 57 +/- 33 months) were similar in the two groups. Rejection rates decreased in both groups but remained significantly higher in the patients treated with methotrexate after initiation of therapy than in the patients treated without methotrexate more than 9.4 months after transplantation (0.15 +/- 0.16 vs 0.06 +/- 0.12 episodes/patient/month; p = 0.0014). Infection rates were higher in patients after methotrexate initiation than in patients treated without methotrexate more than 9.4 months after heart transplantation (0.17 +/- 0.24 vs 0.06 +/- 0.13 episodes/patient/month; p = 0.015). At the end of the follow-up period methotrexate- and non-methotrexate-treated groups did not differ in the percentage of patients with angiographically detectable cardiac allograft vasculopathy (17.1% and 21.2%, respectively) and survival (71.4% and 64.0%, respectively).
Even after reversal of rejection by methotrexate, patients requiring methotrexate for the treatment of persistent/recurrent rejection continued to have higher rejection rates than patients not requiring methotrexate. In spite of persistently higher rejection rates, patients treated with methotrexate did not have higher rates of cardiac allograft vasculopathy. This finding raises the question whether methotrexate provides a protective influence on the development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy in this high-risk group.
在心脏移植受者中,甲氨蝶呤已被证明可逆转强化传统免疫抑制治疗无效的复发性/持续性急性排斥反应。本研究旨在确定甲氨蝶呤是否能持续降低心脏移植排斥率,并使有复发性/持续性排斥反应病史的患者的排斥率与无此类病史的心脏移植受者相似。
比较了35例接受甲氨蝶呤治疗(12±9毫克/周,共34±54周)的患者和236例从未接受甲氨蝶呤治疗的患者的排斥反应、感染及心脏移植血管病变情况。由于从移植到开始使用甲氨蝶呤的平均时间为9.4个月,因此对未接受甲氨蝶呤治疗的患者按心脏移植后≤9.4个月和>9.4个月的事件进行分析。
两组患者的人口统计学特征、围手术期及维持免疫抑制情况以及术后随访时间(分别为58±32个月和57±33个月)相似。两组的排斥率均下降,但在开始治疗后,接受甲氨蝶呤治疗的患者的排斥率仍显著高于心脏移植后>9.4个月未接受甲氨蝶呤治疗的患者(0.15±0.16次/患者/月对0.06±0.12次/患者/月;p = 0.0014)。开始使用甲氨蝶呤后的患者感染率高于心脏移植后>9.4个月未接受甲氨蝶呤治疗的患者(0.17±0.24次/患者/月对0.06±0.13次/患者/月;p = 0.015)。在随访期末,接受甲氨蝶呤治疗组和未接受甲氨蝶呤治疗组在血管造影可检测到心脏移植血管病变的患者百分比(分别为17.1%和21.2%)及生存率(分别为71.4%和64.0%)方面无差异。
即使甲氨蝶呤逆转了排斥反应,因持续性/复发性排斥反应而需要甲氨蝶呤治疗的患者的排斥率仍持续高于不需要甲氨蝶呤治疗的患者。尽管排斥率持续较高,但接受甲氨蝶呤治疗的患者心脏移植血管病变发生率并未更高。这一发现提出了一个问题,即甲氨蝶呤是否对这一高危组心脏移植血管病变的发生具有保护作用。