Haioun C, Lepage E, Gisselbrecht C, Bastion Y, Coiffier B, Brice P, Bosly A, Dupriez B, Nouvel C, Tilly H, Lederlin P, Biron P, Brière J, Gaulard P, Reyes F
Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France.
J Clin Oncol. 1997 Mar;15(3):1131-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.3.1131.
To update the randomized study that compared consolidative sequential treatment (ifosfamide, etoposide, asporaginase, and cytarabine) versus the high-dose regimen of cyclophosphamide, carmustine, and etoposide (CBV) followed by autotransplantation in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in first complete remission and to focus on high-intermediate and high-risk patients identified by the international prognostic index.
Nine hundred sixteen patients received induction treatment on the LNH84 protocol with open randomization for the anthracycline. In a subsequent randomization, 541 patients in complete remission were assigned to receive consolidation by either sequential chemotherapy (n = 273) or autotransplant (n = 268). Among the higher risk population (two or three risk factors), 236 patients in complete remission were assessable for the consolidation phase, with 111 in the sequential chemotherapy arm and 125 in the autotransplant arm.
Among 541 randomized patients, disease-free survival and survival did not differ significantly between the two consolidative treatment arms. In the higher risk population, CBV was superior to sequential chemotherapy, with 5-year disease-free survival rates of 59% (95% confidence interval, 49% to 69%) and 39% (95% confidence interval, 28% to 50%), respectively (P = .01, relative risk = 1.19). The 5-year survival rate was superior in the CBV group at 65% (95% confidence interval, 56% to 74%) compared with 52% in the sequential chemotherapy group (95% confidence interval, 42% to 62%) (P = .06, relative risk = 1.49).
This study shows a superior disease-free survival for higher risk patients in complete remission. Dose-intensive consolidation therapy should be considered for patients at higher risk who achieve complete remission after induction treatment.
更新一项随机研究,该研究比较了巩固序贯治疗(异环磷酰胺、依托泊苷、门冬酰胺酶和阿糖胞苷)与环磷酰胺、卡莫司汀和依托泊苷(CBV)高剂量方案随后进行自体移植,用于首次完全缓解的侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者,并聚焦于国际预后指数确定的高中危和高危患者。
916例患者按照LNH84方案接受诱导治疗,蒽环类药物采用开放随机分组。在随后的随机分组中,541例完全缓解的患者被分配接受序贯化疗(n = 273)或自体移植(n = 268)进行巩固治疗。在高危人群(两个或三个危险因素)中,236例完全缓解的患者可评估巩固治疗阶段,序贯化疗组111例,自体移植组125例。
在541例随机分组的患者中,两种巩固治疗组之间的无病生存率和总生存率无显著差异。在高危人群中,CBV优于序贯化疗,5年无病生存率分别为59%(95%置信区间,49%至69%)和39%(95%置信区间,28%至50%)(P = 0.01,相对风险 = 1.19)。CBV组的5年总生存率为65%(95%置信区间,56%至74%),优于序贯化疗组的52%(95%置信区间,42%至62%)(P = 0.06,相对风险 = 1.49)。
本研究表明,完全缓解的高危患者无病生存率更高。对于诱导治疗后达到完全缓解的高危患者,应考虑采用剂量密集型巩固治疗。