Robertson D M, Cahir N, Findlay J K, Burger H G, Groome N
Prince Henry's Institute of Medical Research, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton Victoria, Australia.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997 Mar;82(3):889-96. doi: 10.1210/jcem.82.3.3801.
In a previous study (see Ref.7), the molecular weight distribution of inhibin activity in fractionated human follicular fluid (hFF) and human male and female plasma/serum was determined by in vitro bioassay using ovine pituitary cells in culture and various specific inhibin A and inhibin alpha-subunit-directed immunoassays. It was shown, however, that the ovine in vitro bioassay detected inhibin B poorly. These findings are extended in the present study by the determination of the molecular weight profile of in vitro bioactivity using rat pituitary cells, which detects both inhibin A and B, a specific inhibin B enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), an RIA detecting the alpha N region of the alpha-subunit, an alpha-subunit ELISA (Pro-alpha C) directed to the inhibin forms containing the Pro sequence, and an alpha C subunit immunofluorometric assay that detects all inhibin forms. The profile in hFF of inhibin in vitro bioactivity, using rat pituitary cells in culture, significantly (P < 0.001) correlated with in vitro bioactivity using ovine pituitary cells (r = 0.85), inhibin A immunoactivity (r = 0.70), inhibin B immunoactivity (r = 0.89), and the combination of inhibin A + B immunoactivities (r = 0.93), with peaks of activity identified at 66K, 55K, 36K and 33K, consistent with presumed known mol wt forms of inhibin. Inhibin B profiles in fractionated serum from women stimulated with gonadotropins and male plasma consisted of two forms (66K and 36K), whereas inhibin A in female serum included, in addition, the 55K form. These findings indicated that higher molecular weight forms of inhibin B are present in biological samples, and their distribution differs from that of inhibin A, suggesting a differential processing of the precursor forms in the circulation. Pro-alpha C immunoactivity was identified in serum samples with prominent peaks at 36K and 29K (known Pro-alpha C subunit forms) and not with any high mol wt dimeric forms of inhibin. If this observation applies to a wider range of serum samples, the Pro-alpha C ELISA may provide an appropriate and specific assay for the measurement of free alpha-subunit. To compare immunoactivity levels between assays, the inhibins A, B, and Pro-alpha C standards were calibrated in terms of their alpha C subunit content, as determined by an alpha C subunit immunoassay, with the inhibin B standard containing 60% of the alpha C subunit content compared with either the inhibin A or Pro-alpha C standard. After adjustments of the various standards for this difference in alpha C subunit content, a comparison was undertaken of the combined levels of inhibins A, B, and Pro-alpha C immunoactivity across the hFF and serum chromatograms and compared with levels determined by the alpha-subunit-directed immunoassays. A high correlation (r = 0.59-0.96) was observed, indicating that the alpha-subunit immunoactivity in serum consists largely of a composite of presumed known molecular weight forms of inhibins A, B, and Pro-alpha C. It is concluded that: 1) inhibin in vitro bioactivity in hFF is largely attributed to the presence of 33-36K and 50-66K forms of inhibins A and B; and 2) inhibin alpha-subunit immunoactivity in hFF and serum is a composite of presumed known forms of inhibin A, inhibin B, and the alpha-subunit.
在之前的一项研究(见参考文献7)中,采用培养的绵羊垂体细胞进行体外生物测定以及各种特异性抑制素A和抑制素α亚基定向免疫测定法,确定了分级分离的人卵泡液(hFF)以及男性和女性血浆/血清中抑制素活性的分子量分布。然而,研究表明,绵羊体外生物测定法对抑制素B的检测效果不佳。在本研究中,通过使用能够同时检测抑制素A和B的大鼠垂体细胞进行体外生物活性分子量分析、一种特异性抑制素B酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)、一种检测α亚基αN区域的放射免疫测定(RIA)、一种针对含有Pro序列的抑制素形式的α亚基ELISA(Pro-αC)以及一种检测所有抑制素形式的αC亚基免疫荧光测定法,对上述研究结果进行了扩展。使用培养的大鼠垂体细胞检测hFF中抑制素的体外生物活性,其结果与使用绵羊垂体细胞检测的体外生物活性(r = 0.85)、抑制素A免疫活性(r = 0.70)、抑制素B免疫活性(r = 0.89)以及抑制素A + B免疫活性之和(r = 0.93)显著相关(P < 0.001),在66K、55K、36K和33K处鉴定出活性峰,这与推测已知分子量形式的抑制素一致。促性腺激素刺激的女性分级分离血清和男性血浆中的抑制素B谱由两种形式(66K和36K)组成,而女性血清中的抑制素A此外还包括55K形式。这些发现表明,生物样品中存在较高分子量形式의抑制素B,其分布与抑制素A不同,这表明循环中前体形式의加工过程存在差异。在血清样品中鉴定出Pro-αC免疫活性,在36K和29K处有突出峰(已知的Pro-αC亚基形式),而未与任何高分子量二聚体形式의抑制素相关。如果这一观察结果适用于更广泛의血清样品范围,那么Pro-αC ELISA可能为游离α亚基의测量提供一种合适且特异的测定方法。为了比较各测定法之间의免疫活性水平,根据通过αC亚基免疫测定法测定的αC亚基含量,对抑制素A、B和Pro-αC标准品进行校准,与抑制素A或Pro-αC标准品相比,抑制素B标准品含有60%의αC亚基含量。在对各标准品의αC亚基含量差异进行调整后,对hFF和血清色谱图上抑制素A、B和Pro-αC免疫活性의综合水平进行了比较,并与α亚基定向免疫测定法测定的水平进行了比较。观察到高度相关性(r = 0.59 - 0.96),表明血清中α亚基免疫活性主要由推测已知分子量形式의抑制素A、B和Pro-αC的复合物组成。得出以下结论:1)hFF中抑制素의体外生物活性很大程度上归因于存在33 - 36K和50 - 66K形式의抑制素A和B;2)hFF和血清中抑制素α亚基免疫活性是推测已知形式의抑制素A、抑制素B和α亚基的复合物。