Hersek N E, Canay S
Department of Prosthodontics, University of Hacettepe, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara, Turkey.
Quintessence Int. 1996 Mar;27(3):211-6.
The in vivo solubility of glass-ionomer, zinc polycarboxylate, and zinc phosphate luting cements was compared. The specimens were inserted in the lingual flanges of the mandibular dentures of 10 edentulous patients. After 8 months, the cement specimens were removed and the amount of solubility was measured with direct techniques. Scanning electron microscopy was used to evaluate surface topography after disintegration. The elements present in each cement were determined with energy-dispersive spectroscopy. The zinc phosphate and zinc polycarboxylate cements demonstrated approximately equal solubility. Glass-ionomer cement exhibited significantly less solubility than did either zinc phosphate or polycarboxylate cement.
比较了玻璃离子水门汀、聚羧酸锌水门汀和磷酸锌水门汀的体内溶解性。将标本插入10例无牙患者下颌义齿的舌侧翼缘。8个月后,取出水门汀标本,采用直接技术测量溶解量。用扫描电子显微镜评估崩解后的表面形貌。用能谱仪测定每种水门汀中存在的元素。磷酸锌水门汀和聚羧酸锌水门汀的溶解性大致相同。玻璃离子水门汀的溶解性明显低于磷酸锌水门汀或聚羧酸锌水门汀。