Preidler K W, Riccabona M, Szolar D M, Kammerhuber F, Sorantin E, Horina J
Universitätsklinik für Radiologie, Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz.
Ultraschall Med. 1996 Oct;17(5):243-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1003190.
To evaluate the efficiency of colour Doppler energy (CDE) in comparison to conventional colour Doppler sonography (CDI) in the detection of renal blood flow signals in asymptomatic patients after renal transplantation.
Fifteen asymptomatic volunteer patients after renal transplantation were examined with CDI and CDE. The examination parameters were kept constant; only the Doppler-receiver gain was varied. Assessment and comparison of blood flow signals were obtained with a self defined score system.
CDI showed Doppler signals in the main stem vessels, segmental and interlobar vessels in all patients; in the arcuate arteries blood flow signals were detected in only 11 of 15 patients. There was no Doppler signal in peripherally located medullary and cortical vessels. CDE showed blood flow signals in the main stem, segmental and interlobar vessels and additionally in the arcuate, interlobular and medullary as well as in the cortical vessels in all patients.
CDE is more sensitive than CDI and improves the detection of blood flow signals in peripheral medullary and cortical vessels of renal transplants.
评估彩色多普勒能量图(CDE)与传统彩色多普勒超声(CDI)相比,在检测肾移植术后无症状患者肾血流信号方面的效能。
对15例肾移植术后无症状志愿者患者进行CDI和CDE检查。检查参数保持恒定;仅改变多普勒接收器增益。采用自定义评分系统对血流信号进行评估和比较。
CDI显示所有患者的主干血管、段间血管和叶间血管中有多普勒信号;在15例患者中,仅11例检测到弓形动脉血流信号。外周髓质和皮质血管中未检测到多普勒信号。CDE显示所有患者的主干、段间和叶间血管中有血流信号,此外,弓形、小叶间、髓质以及皮质血管中也有血流信号。
CDE比CDI更敏感,可改善肾移植外周髓质和皮质血管中血流信号的检测。