• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新泽西州公共诊所中用于识别衣原体感染女性的选择性筛查与推定治疗标准

Selective screening versus presumptive treatment criteria for identification of women with chlamydial infection in public clinics: New Jersey.

作者信息

Finelli L, Nakashima A K, Hillis S, Crayne E, Spitalny K C

机构信息

Sexually Transmitted Diseases Prevention and Control Program, New Jersey Department of Health, Trenton 08625-0369, USA.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 May;174(5):1527-33. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70601-4.

DOI:10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70601-4
PMID:9065124
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Our goals were to determine the prevalence of chlamydial infection, to identify criteria for selective screening, and to compare the sensitivity of selective screening to presumptive treatment criteria in different clinical settings.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 5128 women enrolled in a cross-sectional study in public clinics in New Jersey. Univariate and multivariate methods of statistical analysis were used.

RESULTS

The prevalence of chlamydia varied across type of public clinic and ranged from 8% to 15%. Selective screening criteria were developed for women attending each type of public clinic by use of risk factors significant in the multivariate analyses. A combination of young age and attending an urban clinic was highly predictive of chlamydia infection and identified a minimum of 85% of infected women in all public clinic settings. The use of presumptive treatment criteria identified 78% of infected women in sexually transmitted disease clinics but only 4% to 9% of infected women in other clinical settings.

CONCLUSIONS

A chlamydia program that includes presumptive treatment of women attending sexually transmitted disease clinics and selective screening of women in other clinical settings where women are more likely to asymptomatic is a clinically appropriate and economically feasible approach to directing treatment of women with chlamydial infection.

摘要

目的

我们的目标是确定衣原体感染的患病率,确定选择性筛查的标准,并比较在不同临床环境中选择性筛查与推定治疗标准的敏感性。

研究设计

共有5128名女性参与了新泽西州公共诊所的一项横断面研究。使用了单变量和多变量统计分析方法。

结果

衣原体的患病率因公共诊所类型而异,范围在8%至15%之间。通过使用多变量分析中有显著意义的危险因素,为每种类型公共诊所的就诊女性制定了选择性筛查标准。年轻且在城市诊所就诊这一组合对衣原体感染具有高度预测性,在所有公共诊所环境中能识别出至少85%的感染女性。使用推定治疗标准在性传播疾病诊所中识别出78%的感染女性,但在其他临床环境中仅识别出4%至9%的感染女性。

结论

一个衣原体项目,包括对性传播疾病诊所的就诊女性进行推定治疗,以及对其他女性更可能无症状的临床环境中的女性进行选择性筛查,是指导衣原体感染女性治疗的一种临床适宜且经济可行的方法。

相似文献

1
Selective screening versus presumptive treatment criteria for identification of women with chlamydial infection in public clinics: New Jersey.新泽西州公共诊所中用于识别衣原体感染女性的选择性筛查与推定治疗标准
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 May;174(5):1527-33. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70601-4.
2
Chlamydia trachomatis infection among Hispanic women in the California-Mexico border area, 1993: establishing screening criteria in a primary care setting.1993年加利福尼亚-墨西哥边境地区西班牙裔女性沙眼衣原体感染情况:在初级保健机构中确立筛查标准
Sex Transm Dis. 1995 Nov-Dec;22(6):329-34. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199511000-00001.
3
Selective screening for chlamydial infection: which criteria to use?
Am J Prev Med. 2000 Feb;18(2):115-22. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00146-4.
4
Chlamydia trachomatis screening in urine among asymptomatic men attending an STI clinic in Paris: a cross-sectional study.沙眼衣原体在巴黎性传播感染诊所就诊无症状男性中的尿液筛查:一项横断面研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Jan 8;19(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3595-6.
5
Decreased prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection associated with a selective screening program in family planning clinics in Wisconsin.威斯康星州计划生育诊所中与选择性筛查项目相关的沙眼衣原体感染患病率降低。
Sex Transm Dis. 1993 Jan-Feb;20(1):28-35. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199301000-00006.
6
Selective screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in nonurban family planning clinics in Wisconsin.威斯康星州非城市计划生育诊所沙眼衣原体感染的选择性筛查。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1987 Nov-Dec;19(6):252-6.
7
Risk assessment and other screening options for gonorrhoea and chlamydial infections in women attending rural Tanzanian antenatal clinics.坦桑尼亚农村地区产前诊所就诊女性淋病和衣原体感染的风险评估及其他筛查方案
Bull World Health Organ. 1995;73(5):621-30.
8
Risk factors for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in 6810 young women attending family planning clinics.6810名前往计划生育诊所就诊的年轻女性沙眼衣原体感染的危险因素
Int J STD AIDS. 1992 Mar-Apr;3(2):117-22. doi: 10.1177/095646249200300208.
9
Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis in a public colposcopy clinic population.一家公共阴道镜检查诊所人群中沙眼衣原体的患病率。
Sex Health. 2007 Jun;4(2):133-6. doi: 10.1071/sh06050.
10
Performance and cost-effectiveness of selective screening criteria for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women. Implications for a national Chlamydia control strategy.女性沙眼衣原体感染选择性筛查标准的性能和成本效益。对国家衣原体控制策略的影响。
Sex Transm Dis. 1997 Mar;24(3):131-41. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199703000-00003.

引用本文的文献

1
Presumptive and Follow-up Treatment for Gonorrhea and Chlamydia Among Patients Attending Public Health Department Clinics in Virginia, 2016.2016 年弗吉尼亚州公共卫生部门诊所就诊患者淋病和衣原体病的初步治疗和后续治疗。
Sex Transm Dis. 2019 Mar;46(3):199-205. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000922.
2
Developing a predictive model to prioritize human immunodeficiency virus partner notification in North Carolina.开发一种预测模型,以优先通知北卡罗来纳州的人类免疫缺陷病毒感染者的性伴侣。
Sex Transm Dis. 2012 Jan;39(1):65-71. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318239da4e.
3
Formulas for estimating the costs averted by sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevention programs in the United States.
估算美国性传播感染(STI)预防计划所避免成本的公式。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2008 May 23;6:10. doi: 10.1186/1478-7547-6-10.
4
Risk factors for genital chlamydial infection.生殖道衣原体感染的危险因素。
Can J Infect Dis. 2002 May;13(3):195-207. doi: 10.1155/2002/954837.
5
An ongoing burden: chlamydial infections among young American Indian women.持续存在的负担:美国印第安年轻女性中的衣原体感染
Matern Child Health J. 2008 Jul;12 Suppl 1:25-9. doi: 10.1007/s10995-007-0293-1.
6
Low diagnostic accuracy of selective screening criteria for asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infections in the general population.普通人群中无症状沙眼衣原体感染选择性筛查标准的诊断准确性较低。
Sex Transm Infect. 2000 Oct;76(5):375-80. doi: 10.1136/sti.76.5.375.