Suppr超能文献

[在以饲用甜菜补充青贮牧草饲喂期间奶牛的采食量及生产性能]

[Feed intake and performance of dairy cows during feeding of fodder beets supplementing grass silage].

作者信息

Birkenmaier F, Schwarz F J, Müller H L, Kirchgessner M

机构信息

Institut für Ernährungsphysiologie, Technischen Universität München in Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany.

出版信息

Arch Tierernahr. 1996;49(4):335-47. doi: 10.1080/17450399609381896.

Abstract

In a feeding experiment 3 x 12 dairy cows (German Simmental x Red Holstein Friesian) were used to investigate the influence of different amounts of fodder beets on feed intake, milk yield and milk composition. The fodder beets (variety Kyros) were fed in exchange for concentrate. The amounts of fodder beets were either 22 kg cow-1 d-1 or 44 kg cow-1 d-1 or zero (control group). All groups received 4 kg hay cow-1 d-1, grass silage ad libitum, and concentrate corresponding to the milk yield. In order to balance the rations the concentrate was either rich in protein or rich in energy. Feeding 22 kg or 44 kg fodder beets increased forage intake (including fodder beets) significantly. However, the total feed intake diminished on average from 18.3 kg DM cow-1 d-1 (control group) to 17.2 kg DM cow-1 d-1 (fodder beet groups). In each treatment the intake of hay was 3.3 kg DM cow-1 d-1. However, the intake of grass silage offered ad libitum was significantly suppressed by the fodder beets. Considering the different amounts of concentrate the quantity of suppression of grass silage by feeding fodder beets was calculated at -0.8 kg DM of grass silage per kg DM of fodder beet intake. The milk yield decreased linearly with increasing fodder beets on average up to 4 kg cow-1 d-1. However, the milk composition was scarcely influenced. The fat content increased a little, the mean alterations of the protein and lactose content were below 0.1 percentage points. Therefore, the change in daily excretion of milk fat, protein or lactose were similar to the change in milk yield. In conclusion, feeding fodder beets in combination to grass silage causes a positive effect on forage intake (including fodder beets). However, the amount of concentrate should not be reduced equivalently to the energy contents of the added fodder beets.

摘要

在一项饲养试验中,选用3×12头奶牛(德国西门塔尔牛×红荷斯坦弗里生牛)来研究不同量的饲用甜菜对采食量、产奶量和牛奶成分的影响。饲用甜菜(品种为Kyros)用于替代精饲料。饲用甜菜的用量分别为每头奶牛每天22千克、44千克或零(对照组)。所有组每头奶牛每天均饲喂4千克干草,自由采食青贮饲料,并根据产奶量提供相应的精饲料。为了平衡日粮,精饲料要么富含蛋白质,要么富含能量。饲喂22千克或44千克饲用甜菜显著增加了草料采食量(包括饲用甜菜)。然而,总采食量平均从每头奶牛每天18.3千克干物质(对照组)降至17.2千克干物质(饲用甜菜组)。在每种处理中,干草采食量均为每头奶牛每天3.3千克干物质。然而,饲用甜菜显著抑制了自由采食的青贮饲料的采食量。考虑到不同量的精饲料,饲用甜菜对青贮饲料采食量的抑制量计算为每千克干物质饲用甜菜采食量对应-0.8千克干物质青贮饲料。平均而言,随着饲用甜菜用量增加至每头奶牛每天4千克,产奶量呈线性下降。然而,牛奶成分几乎未受影响。脂肪含量略有增加,蛋白质和乳糖含量的平均变化低于0.1个百分点。因此,乳脂、蛋白质或乳糖的日排泄量变化与产奶量变化相似。总之,将饲用甜菜与青贮饲料搭配饲喂对草料采食量(包括饲用甜菜)有积极影响。然而,精饲料的量不应与添加的饲用甜菜的能量含量等量减少。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验