Suppr超能文献

弗吉尼亚大学采用改良洛思罗普手术的经验随访。

Follow-up of University of Virginia experience with the modified Lothrop procedure.

作者信息

Gross C W, Zachmann G C, Becker D G, Vickery C L, Moore D F, Lindsey W H, Gross W E

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville 22908, USA.

出版信息

Am J Rhinol. 1997 Jan-Feb;11(1):49-54. doi: 10.2500/105065897781446784.

Abstract

Current surgical treatment of the frontal sinus disease include external approaches to obliterate or ablate the sinus and both external and transnasal methods to restore drainage into the nasal cavity. The original Lothrop procedure resects the medial frontal sinus floor, superior nasal septum, and intersinus septum, creating a large frontonasal communication. However, as described, the external approach used in this procedure often allowed medial collapse of soft tissue and the stenosis of the nasofrontal communication. This report further relates our experience with the modified transnasal endoscopic Lothrop procedure using suction drills for cases in which frontal recess exploration had failed to relieve obstruction of the frontal sinus. We present an update of the University of Virginia experience in performing the modified Lothrop procedure in 20 patients from 10/93 to 4/95. Our findings over the follow-up period (average 12 months) have verified that this procedure is effective, with a 95% patency rate for the surgically enlarged frontal sinus ostium. When compared to osteoplastic flap with fat obliteration, the modified transnasal Lothrop procedure offers the advantages of a less invasive procedure with a shorter and usually no hospitalization, less morbidity, and the increased ability to evaluate post-operatively for recurrent disease. A patient charge analysis was also performed comparing patients undergoing frontal sinus obliteration during the same time period, revealing an additional benefit of decreased patient costs for the modified transnasal Lothrop procedure. None of our patients experienced complications, and all showed significant improvement, if not complete resolution of their symptoms. Although this procedure has produced favorable results, it should be noted that this procedure is technically demanding and will require further long term follow-up to verify its efficacy and proper role in the spectrum of surgical approaches for the treatment of chronic sinusitis.

摘要

目前额窦疾病的外科治疗方法包括通过外部入路闭塞或切除鼻窦,以及采用外部和经鼻方法恢复鼻窦向鼻腔的引流。最初的洛思罗普手术切除额窦内侧底部、鼻中隔上部和鼻窦间隔,形成一个大的额鼻通道。然而,如前所述,该手术中使用的外部入路常常导致软组织向内侧塌陷以及鼻额通道狭窄。本报告进一步阐述了我们在额隐窝探查未能缓解额窦梗阻的病例中,使用吸引钻进行改良经鼻内镜洛思罗普手术的经验。我们介绍了弗吉尼亚大学在1993年10月至1995年4月期间对20例患者实施改良洛思罗普手术的最新情况。我们在随访期(平均12个月)的研究结果证实,该手术是有效的,手术扩大的额窦开口通畅率为95%。与带脂肪闭塞的骨成形瓣手术相比,改良经鼻洛思罗普手术具有侵入性较小、住院时间较短且通常无需住院、发病率较低以及术后评估复发性疾病能力增强等优点。我们还进行了患者费用分析,比较了同一时期接受额窦闭塞手术的患者,结果显示改良经鼻洛思罗普手术还有降低患者费用的额外益处。我们的患者均未出现并发症,所有患者的症状即使没有完全缓解也都有显著改善。尽管该手术取得了良好效果,但应当指出,该手术技术要求较高,需要进一步长期随访以验证其疗效以及在慢性鼻窦炎手术治疗方法中的恰当作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验