Rho J M, Donevan S D, Rogawski M A
Epilepsy Research Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1408, USA.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1997 Mar;280(3):1383-91.
Felbamate and meprobamate are structurally related propanediol dicarbamates that possess distinct pharmacological profiles. Felbamate is a minimally sedative, broad-spectrum anticonvulsant, whereas meprobamate is a strong sedative-anxiolytic agent. Previously, we reported that felbamate potentiates gamma-aminobutyric acid(A) (GABA(A)) receptor Cl- currents and inhibits N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor currents. Here we further characterized the interaction of the two dicarbamates with GABA(A) receptors to determine the basis for their pharmacological differences. In whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings from cultured rat hippocampal neurons, meprobamate enhanced GABA-evoked responses in a concentration-dependent manner and, at high concentrations (>1 mM), exhibited a separate channel-blocking effect that limited the magnitude of GABA(A) receptor potentiation. At equivalent concentrations, meprobamate produced substantially greater potentiation than did felbamate. Furthermore, meprobamate (but not felbamate), in the absence of GABA, directly activated Cl- currents that could be attenuated by the GABA(A) receptor antagonists bicuculline and picrotoxin. The mean deactivation time constant of whole-cell currents evoked by 10 mM meprobamate (110 ms) or 1 and 3 microM GABA (180 ms) were faster than the deactivation time constant of 10 mM meprobamate (490 ms) or 3 mM felbamate (470 ms) in the presence of GABA. Meprobamate and felbamate prolonged the mean burst duration of GABA-activated unitary currents in excised outside-out membrane patches. In addition, at high (supratherapeutic) concentrations, meprobamate blocked NMDA-activated currents. We conclude that felbamate and meprobamate have barbiturate-like modulatory actions on GABA(A) receptors, but meprobamate has greater activity and, unlike felbamate, is able to directly activate the receptor.
非氨酯和甲丙氨酯是结构相关的丙二醇二氨基甲酸酯,具有不同的药理学特征。非氨酯是一种轻度镇静的广谱抗惊厥药,而甲丙氨酯是一种强效的镇静抗焦虑药。此前,我们报道过非氨酯可增强γ-氨基丁酸A(GABA(A))受体的氯离子电流并抑制N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸(NMDA)受体电流。在此,我们进一步研究了这两种二氨基甲酸酯与GABA(A)受体的相互作用,以确定它们药理学差异的基础。在培养的大鼠海马神经元的全细胞膜片钳记录中,甲丙氨酯以浓度依赖的方式增强GABA诱发的反应,并且在高浓度(>1 mM)时,表现出一种单独的通道阻断作用,限制了GABA(A)受体增强的幅度。在等效浓度下,甲丙氨酯产生的增强作用比非氨酯大得多。此外,在没有GABA的情况下,甲丙氨酯(而非非氨酯)直接激活氯离子电流,该电流可被GABA(A)受体拮抗剂荷包牡丹碱和印防己毒素减弱。在有GABA存在的情况下,10 mM甲丙氨酯(110 ms)或1和3 μM GABA(180 ms)诱发的全细胞电流的平均失活时间常数比10 mM甲丙氨酯(490 ms)或3 mM非氨酯(470 ms)的失活时间常数更快。甲丙氨酯和非氨酯延长了在切除的外侧向外膜片中GABA激活的单位电流的平均爆发持续时间。此外,在高(超治疗)浓度下,甲丙氨酯阻断NMDA激活的电流。我们得出结论,非氨酯和甲丙氨酯对GABA(A)受体具有类似巴比妥类药物的调节作用,但甲丙氨酯具有更大的活性,并且与非氨酯不同,它能够直接激活该受体。