Mogensen M M, Mackie J B, Doxsey S J, Stearns T, Tucker J B
School of Biological and Medical Sciences, University of St. Andrews, Fife, Scotland, UK.
Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1997;36(3):276-90. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0169(1997)36:3<276::AID-CM8>3.0.CO;2-5.
This report provides evidence for two functionally and spatially distinct centrosomal domains in certain mouse cochlear epithelial cells. The vast majority of microtubules elongate from sites associated with the apical cell surface in these cells rather than from pericentriolar material surrounding the immediate environs of their apically situate centrioles. The distribution of gamma-tubulin and pericentrin at cell apices has been examined while microtubule nucleation is progressing because these centrosomal proteins are believed to be essential for microtubule nucleation. Antibodies to both proteins bind to pericentriolar regions but no binding has been detected at the apical cell surface-associated sites where the ends of thousands of recently nucleated microtubules are concentrated. Sparse transient microtubule populations can be detected between pericentriolar regions and surface sites while microtubule assembly advances. A procedure apparently operates in which the pericentriolar region functions as a microtubule-nucleating domain and the cell surface-associated sites operate as docking domains which capture the minus ends of microtubules that migrate to them shortly after nucleation. Docking domains may include some components of the pericentriolar material that have been relocated at the cell apex. A docking element hypothesis for centrosomal control of minus end positioning and dynamics in animal cells generally is proposed. This investigation has also shown that the concentration of gamma-tubulin and pericentrin around centrioles differs spatially and quantitatively in ways that are characteristic for the four cell types studied. Some of these characteristics can be related to differences in control of microtubule number and positioning.
本报告为某些小鼠耳蜗上皮细胞中两个功能和空间上不同的中心体结构域提供了证据。在这些细胞中,绝大多数微管从与细胞顶端表面相关的位点延伸,而不是从围绕其顶端中心粒紧邻区域的中心粒周围物质延伸。在微管成核过程中,对γ-微管蛋白和中心体蛋白在细胞顶端的分布进行了检测,因为这些中心体蛋白被认为对微管成核至关重要。针对这两种蛋白的抗体都与中心粒周围区域结合,但在数千个新形成的微管末端集中的顶端细胞表面相关位点未检测到结合。在微管组装过程中,可以在中心粒周围区域和表面位点之间检测到稀疏的瞬时微管群体。显然存在一种机制,其中中心粒周围区域作为微管成核结构域,而细胞表面相关位点作为对接结构域,捕获成核后不久迁移到它们的微管负端。对接结构域可能包括一些已重新定位到细胞顶端的中心粒周围物质的成分。一般来说,提出了一种关于动物细胞中中心体对微管负端定位和动态控制的对接元件假说。这项研究还表明,中心粒周围γ-微管蛋白和中心体蛋白的浓度在空间和数量上存在差异,这些差异是所研究的四种细胞类型的特征。其中一些特征可能与微管数量和定位控制的差异有关。