Bowen R W
Department of Psychology, Loyola University Chicago, IL 60626,USA.
Vision Res. 1997 Jan;37(2):185-98. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(96)00110-1.
Pattern contrast discrimination is typically studied with simultaneous onset of the base contrast (C) and added contrast (delta C) patterns. I measured contrast discrimination functions at pattern offset. A brief (30 msec) localized, spatially narrow-band D6 test stimulus was delta C. The onset of delta C was simultaneous with the offset of a large, 500 msec cosine pattern (the base contrast C). The D6 was either positive or negative contrast, and was masked by either positive or negative contrast, i.e., a light or dark bar of the cosine pattern. Stimuli were 3 cpd. Discrimination of negative delta C at the offset of positive contrast followed a "dipper" function, as if the OFF pathway were isolated. A dipper function was also obtained for a positive delta C at the offset of negative contrast (ON pathway isolation). But same-polarity delta C and C yield a monotonic discrimination function ("bumper" function) at the offset of C, suggesting inhibitory interaction. These discrimination functions for same-and opposite-polarity delta C and C are the reverse of functions obtained at pattern onset. Manipulations of temporal asynchrony between patterns and manipulations of pattern polarity are thus functionally equivalent in determining the form of the contrast discrimination function. In a second experiment, I determined delta C at times before and after the offset of a high-contrast C and manipulated pattern polarity. The time course of threshold change is different for same vs opposite-polarity test and mask. The results suggest that interaction between ON and OFF pathways is delayed relative to the masking process within a pathway. Interaction between pathways may function to improve temporal resolution by suppressing persistence of neural response in the complementary pathway. The present pattern polarity and temporal asynchrony effects on the contrast discrimination function also decisively falsify the "uncertainty" hypothesis for low-contrast threshold facilitation (the dipper).
模式对比度辨别通常是通过同时呈现基础对比度(C)和添加对比度(ΔC)模式来进行研究的。我测量了模式偏移时的对比度辨别函数。一个短暂的(30毫秒)局部、空间窄带的D6测试刺激就是ΔC。ΔC的起始与一个大的、500毫秒的余弦模式(基础对比度C)的偏移同时发生。D6可以是正对比度或负对比度,并被正对比度或负对比度所掩蔽,即余弦模式的亮条或暗条。刺激频率为3周/度。在正对比度偏移时对负ΔC的辨别遵循“勺状”函数,就好像OFF通路被分离了一样。在负对比度偏移时对正ΔC也得到了勺状函数(ON通路分离)。但是同极性的ΔC和C在C的偏移时产生单调辨别函数(“保险杠”函数),表明存在抑制性相互作用。这些同极性和反极性ΔC与C的辨别函数与模式起始时得到的函数相反。因此,在确定对比度辨别函数的形式时,模式之间时间异步的操作和模式极性的操作在功能上是等效的。在第二个实验中,我在高对比度C偏移之前和之后的时间点确定了ΔC,并操纵了模式极性。对于同极性与反极性的测试和掩蔽,阈值变化的时间进程是不同的。结果表明,ON和OFF通路之间的相互作用相对于通路内的掩蔽过程有所延迟。通路之间的相互作用可能通过抑制互补通路中神经反应的持续性来提高时间分辨率。目前模式极性和时间异步对对比度辨别函数的影响也决定性地证伪了低对比度阈值促进(勺状)的“不确定性”假说。