Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜阑尾切除术——值得做吗?一项针对年轻女性的前瞻性随机研究。

Laparoscopic appendectomy-is it worthwhile? A prospective, randomized study in young women.

作者信息

Laine S, Rantala A, Gullichsen R, Ovaska J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Turku University Central Hospital, Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 1997 Feb;11(2):95-7. doi: 10.1007/s004649900305.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis is most difficult in fertile-age women. In this patient group up to 50% of open appendectomies are negative for appendicitis. We conducted a randomized study to compare laparoscopic and open appendectomy in young female patients with suspected acute appendicitis.

METHODS

Fifty female patients between the ages of 16 and 40 years presenting with acute right lower abdominal pain were randomized, 25 to laparoscopy and 25 to an open appendectomy. Diagnostic accuracy, rate of negative appendectomies, safety, and final outcome were compared in the two groups.

RESULTS

Diagnosis was established in 96% of patients in the laparoscopic group and in 72% in the open group. There were 11 (44%) unnecessary appendectomies in the open group, but only one (4%) in the laparoscopic group (p < 0.0005).

CONCLUSIONS

In young women with right lower abdominal pain, laparoscopy can give precise diagnosis and reduce the rate of negative appendectomies.

摘要

背景

急性阑尾炎的临床诊断在育龄女性中最为困难。在该患者群体中,高达50%的开腹阑尾切除术阑尾病理结果为阴性。我们进行了一项随机研究,比较腹腔镜阑尾切除术和开腹阑尾切除术在疑似急性阑尾炎的年轻女性患者中的效果。

方法

50例年龄在16至40岁之间、出现急性右下腹痛的女性患者被随机分组,25例行腹腔镜手术,25例行开腹阑尾切除术。比较两组的诊断准确性、阑尾切除阴性率、安全性和最终结果。

结果

腹腔镜组96%的患者确诊,开腹组为72%。开腹组有11例(44%)阑尾切除不必要,但腹腔镜组仅1例(4%)(p<0.0005)。

结论

对于右下腹痛的年轻女性,腹腔镜检查可进行精确诊断并降低阑尾切除阴性率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验