Major D, Cadenas M, Cloutier R, Leclerc S, Fournier L, Shaffer TH, Wolfson MR
Laboratoire d'Investigation en Anesthesie et neonatologie Unite de Recherche en Pediatrie, Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite Laval, Quebec, Canada
Pediatr Surg Int. 1997 Mar 21;12(2/3):121-5.
To test the hypothesis that perfluorochemical (PFC) instillation may reduce the pulmonary trauma commonly associated with conventional gas ventilation, we studied 12 lambs with normal lungs and 10 with pulmonary hypoplasia secondary to congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). We used mechanical ventilation for up to 3.5 h, with and without tracheal instillation of LiquiVent PFC liquid. At the end of experimentation lungs were fixed for morphometrical analysis of their components and pulmonary trauma was evaluated by measurement of the perivascular compression index (PCI = % perivascular emphysema/% vessels). In normal lungs good gas exchange and respiratory mechanics were obtained with all modes of ventilation, with no statistical difference in the index of pulmonary trauma with or without instillation of LiquiVent (P >0.05). In the hypoplastic lungs, tracheal instillation of PFC liquid after 30 min of conventional gas ventilation significantly improved PaCO2 (from 107+/-8 to 55+/-6 mmHg, P <0.05), pH (from 7.00+/-0.03 to 7.29+/-0.04, P <0.05), compliance (from 0.08+/-0.01 to 0.25+/-0.03 ml/cmH2O . kg, P <0.05), and ventilatory index (from 1,445+/-148 to 794+/-139, P <0.05). Survival was 6/6 animals with PFC ventilation compared to 1/4 with conventional gas ventilation with no more pulmonary trauma (mean PCI 12.6+/-1.8 vs. 11.4+/-4.0%, P >0.05) for a longer mean ventilatory period in the PFC group. We conclude that the PFC liquid technique of ventilation can improve respiratory physiology when conventional gas ventilation alone is proving inefficient. There was no significant difference in pulmonary trauma at morphometrics between gas and partial liquid ventilation.
为了验证全氟化合物(PFC)滴注可能减轻通常与传统气体通气相关的肺损伤这一假设,我们研究了12只肺功能正常的羔羊以及10只因先天性膈疝(CDH)继发肺发育不全的羔羊。我们采用机械通气长达3.5小时,分别在气管内滴注LiquiVent PFC液体和不滴注的情况下进行通气。实验结束时,将肺固定以对其组成部分进行形态计量学分析,并通过测量血管周围压缩指数(PCI = 血管周围气肿百分比/血管百分比)来评估肺损伤。在正常肺中,所有通气模式均能实现良好的气体交换和呼吸力学,滴注或不滴注LiquiVent时肺损伤指数无统计学差异(P>0.05)。在发育不全的肺中,传统气体通气30分钟后气管内滴注PFC液体可显著改善动脉血二氧化碳分压(从107±8降至55±6 mmHg,P<0.05)、pH值(从7.00±0.03升至7.29±0.04,P<0.05)、顺应性(从0.08±0.01升至0.25±0.03 ml/cmH2O·kg,P<0.05)以及通气指数(从1445±148降至794±139,P<0.05)。PFC通气组6/6的动物存活,而传统气体通气组4只动物中仅1只存活,且PFC通气组平均通气时间更长,肺损伤无进一步加重(平均PCI为12.6±1.8% vs. 11.4±4.0%,P>0.05)。我们得出结论,当单独使用传统气体通气效率低下时,PFC液体通气技术可改善呼吸生理学。气体通气和部分液体通气在形态计量学上的肺损伤无显著差异。