Rockwood C A, Groh G I, Wirth M A, Grassi F A
Department of Orthopaedics, The University of Texas Medical School at San Antonio, 78284-7774, USA.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 Mar;79(3):387-93. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199703000-00011.
The results of resection of the medial end of the clavicle to treat a painful sternoclavicular joint in fifteen patients were retrospectively reviewed. The patients fell into two groups: eight patients who had had a primary arthroplasty of the sternoclavicular joint in which the costoclavicular ligament was left intact (group I), and seven patients who had had revision of a failed arthroplasty of the sternoclavicular joint and in whom the costoclavicular ligament had to be reconstructed (group II). The results for these two groups were compared at an average of 7.7 years postoperatively. All eight patients in group I had an excellent result. In sharp contrast, three patients in group II had an excellent result, three had a fair result, and one had a poor result. We conclude that preservation or reconstruction of the costoclavicular ligament is essential at the time of resection of the medial portion of the clavicle in order to obtain a satisfactory result.
对15例因疼痛性胸锁关节而行锁骨内侧端切除术的患者结果进行回顾性分析。患者分为两组:8例曾行胸锁关节初次置换术,术中保留肋锁韧带(I组);7例曾行失败的胸锁关节置换术翻修术,术中需重建肋锁韧带(II组)。对两组患者术后平均7.7年的结果进行比较。I组8例患者均获极佳疗效。与之形成鲜明对比的是,II组7例患者中,3例获极佳疗效,3例疗效尚可,1例疗效差。我们得出结论,为获得满意疗效,在切除锁骨内侧部分时,保留或重建肋锁韧带至关重要。