Suppr超能文献

当输入与互斥性假设相矛盾时,词汇学习者会怎么做。

What word learners do when input contradicts the mutual exclusivity assumption.

作者信息

Savage S L, Au T K

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of California, Riverside 92521, USA.

出版信息

Child Dev. 1996 Dec;67(6):3120-34.

PMID:9071773
Abstract

In 4 studies, 3- to 5-year-olds heard 2 novel English labels each applied to the same novel object by a different adult. In all 4 studies, about half of the children accepted both labels, suggesting that hearing 2 labels applied to an object offers strong enough evidence for some to override mutual exclusivity. Nonetheless, about half of the children honored mutual exclusivity and hence accepted only 1 label; they also seemed to keep both labels in mind for at least a few minutes and settled on whichever label they re-encountered first. This strategy allows children to make an informed choice between 2 apparently equally good labels, without straining their limited memory capacities.

摘要

在4项研究中,3至5岁的儿童听到两个新颖的英语标签,每个标签由不同的成年人应用于同一个新颖的物体上。在所有4项研究中,大约一半的儿童接受了两个标签,这表明听到一个物体有两个标签,足以让一些儿童推翻相互排斥原则。尽管如此,大约一半的儿童遵循相互排斥原则,因此只接受一个标签;他们似乎也能将两个标签都记住至少几分钟,并选择首先再次遇到的那个标签。这种策略使儿童能够在两个看似同样合适的标签之间做出明智的选择,而不会给他们有限的记忆能力造成太大压力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验