• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经济和人口增长对国民储蓄及不平等的影响。

The effects of economic and population growth on national saving and inequality.

作者信息

Deaton A S, Paxson C H

机构信息

Research Program in Development Studies, Princeton University, NJ 08544-1022, USA.

出版信息

Demography. 1997 Feb;34(1):97-114.

PMID:9074834
Abstract

This is a progress report on ongoing research into the effects of economic and population growth on national saving rates and inequality. The theoretical basis for the investigation is the life cycle model of saving and inequality. We report evidence that is conditional on the validity of the model, as well as evidence that casts doubt on it. Using time series of cross-sectional household surveys from Taiwan, Thailand, Britain, and the United States, we show that it is possible to force a life cycle interpretation on the data on consumption, income, and saving, but that the evidence is not consistent with large rate-of-growth effects, whereby economic and population growth enhances rates of national saving. The well-established cross-country link between economic growth and saving cannot be attributed to life cycle saving, nor will changes in economic or population growth exert large effects on saving within individual countries. There is evidence in favor of the life cycle model's prediction that within-cohort inequality of consumption and of total income--though not necessarily inequality of earnings--should increase with the age of the cohort. Decreases in the population growth rate redistribute population toward older, more unequal, cohorts, and can increase national inequality. We provide calculations on the magnitude of these effects.

摘要

这是一份关于经济和人口增长对国民储蓄率及不平等现象影响的正在进行的研究的进展报告。该调查的理论基础是储蓄与不平等的生命周期模型。我们报告了以该模型有效性为条件的证据,以及对其产生怀疑的证据。利用来自台湾、泰国、英国和美国的横截面家庭调查的时间序列,我们表明有可能对消费、收入和储蓄数据进行生命周期解释,但证据并不支持经济和人口增长会提高国民储蓄率这种大幅增长效应。经济增长与储蓄之间已确立的跨国联系不能归因于生命周期储蓄,经济或人口增长的变化也不会对单个国家的储蓄产生重大影响。有证据支持生命周期模型的预测,即同组人群内部消费和总收入的不平等——尽管不一定是收入不平等——应随着人群年龄的增长而增加。人口增长率的下降会使人口重新分布到年龄更大、不平等程度更高的人群中,并可能加剧国家层面的不平等。我们对这些影响的程度进行了计算。

相似文献

1
The effects of economic and population growth on national saving and inequality.经济和人口增长对国民储蓄及不平等的影响。
Demography. 1997 Feb;34(1):97-114.
2
Household saving and demographic change, 1950-2050.1950 - 2050年的家庭储蓄与人口结构变化
Res Popul Econ. 1984;5:217-33.
3
Economic consequences of population size, structure and growth.人口规模、结构和增长的经济后果。
Newsl Int Union Sci Study Popul. 1983 Jan-Apr(17):43-59.
4
Whose health is affected by income inequality? A multilevel interaction analysis of contemporaneous and lagged effects of state income inequality on individual self-rated health in the United States.谁的健康受到收入不平等的影响?美国州收入不平等对个人自评健康的同期和滞后效应的多层次交互分析。
Health Place. 2006 Jun;12(2):141-56. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2004.11.001. Epub 2005 Jan 18.
5
Population growth, inequality and poverty.人口增长、不平等与贫困。
Int Labour Rev. 1983 Jul-Aug;122(4):443-60.
6
Demographic links to savings in life cycle models: identification of issues for LDCs.
Indian Econ J. 1992 Jul-Sep;40(1):116-38.
7
Income inequality and population health: correlation and causality.收入不平等与人口健康:相关性与因果关系。
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Apr;66(7):1614-26. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.12.012. Epub 2008 Jan 28.
8
Recent changes in earnings distributions in the United States: age and cohort effects.美国收入分配的近期变化:年龄和同期群效应。
Soc Secur Bull. 1999;62(2):14-29.
9
Population, internal migration, and economic growth: an empirical analysis.人口、国内迁移与经济增长:实证分析
Res Popul Econ. 1982;4:173-216.
10
Cumulative Advantage, Cumulative Disadvantage, and Evolving Patterns of Late-Life Inequality.累积优势、累积劣势与晚年不平等的演变模式。
Gerontologist. 2017 Oct 1;57(5):910-920. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnw056.

引用本文的文献

1
Does the digital economy promote or inhibit income inequality?数字经济是促进还是抑制了收入不平等?
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 4;10(14):e33533. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33533. eCollection 2024 Jul 30.
2
Supplemental income program design: A cluster-randomized controlled trial to examine the health and wellbeing effects on older adults by gender, duration, and payment frequency.补充收入计划设计:一项按性别、持续时间和支付频率进行的群组随机对照试验,旨在研究其对老年人健康和幸福感的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Aug;259:113139. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113139. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
3
Anatomic and neuropsychological findings in low-educated cognitively intact elderly from a Brazilian cohort.
来自巴西队列的低学历认知功能正常老年人的解剖学和神经心理学发现。
Dement Neuropsychol. 2019 Oct-Dec;13(4):378-385. doi: 10.1590/1980-57642018dn13-040003.
4
Charting the Economic Life Cycle.绘制经济生命周期
Popul Dev Rev. 2014;34(Suppl 1):208-237.
5
Impact of increased economic burden due to human echinococcosis in an underdeveloped rural community of the People's Republic of China.因人体包虫病导致的经济负担加重对中国欠发达农村社区的影响。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010 Sep 14;4(9):e801. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000801.
6
Demographic Change, Social Security Systems, and Savings.人口结构变化、社会保障制度与储蓄
J Monet Econ. 2007 Jan 1;54(1):92-114. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2006.12.004.
7
Age-distribution dynamics and aging indexes.年龄分布动态与老龄化指标。
Demography. 1997 Nov;34(4):551-63.