Suppr超能文献

外部组织扩张器的临床经验。

Clinical experiences with the external tissue extender.

作者信息

Brongo S, Pilegaard J, Blomqvist G

机构信息

Department of Plastic Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden.

出版信息

Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1997 Mar;31(1):57-63. doi: 10.3109/02844319709010506.

Abstract

Forty one patients were operated on for different skin defects using the external tissue extender (ETE). The indications were similar to those in which ordinary tissue expanders were used with a prevalence of scars (n = 20, 46%) and previous skin grafts (n = 12, 28%). The ETE was used all over the body but mainly on the upper (n = 18, 42%) and lower (n = 12, 28%) extremities. The mean treatment time was eight days, and the complication rate was 8% compared with the reported 25% using ordinary tissue expanders. The advantages of the ETE compared to ordinary tissue expanders are that it saves time and money for doctors and patients, it is easy to handle, and it is almost always possible to operate under local anaesthesia.

摘要

41例患者使用外部组织扩张器(ETE)治疗不同的皮肤缺损。其适应症与使用普通组织扩张器的情况相似,以瘢痕为主(n = 20,46%)和既往有植皮史(n = 12,28%)。ETE应用于全身,但主要用于上肢(n = 18,42%)和下肢(n = 12,28%)。平均治疗时间为8天,并发症发生率为8%,而报道的使用普通组织扩张器的并发症发生率为25%。与普通组织扩张器相比,ETE的优点在于它为医生和患者节省了时间和金钱,易于操作,并且几乎总是可以在局部麻醉下进行手术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验