Keyserling T C, Ammerman A S, Davis C E, Mok M C, Garrett J, Simpson R
Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA.
Arch Fam Med. 1997 Mar-Apr;6(2):135-45. doi: 10.1001/archfami.6.2.135.
To assess the effectiveness of a cholesterol-lowering intervention designed to facilitate the management of hypercholesterolemia by primary care clinicians.
Randomized controlled trial, with randomization of clinician-patient groups.
Twenty-one community and rural health centers in North Carolina and Virginia.
Primary care clinicians (n = 42, 71% physicians) and the patients they enrolled with high cholesterol (n = 372). Twenty-two clinicians were randomized to give the special intervention (184 patients) and 20 to give usual care (188 patients). Two thirds of participating patients were women, 40% were African American, and 11% were Native American.
A 90-minute tutorial to train clinicians how to use a structured assessment and treatment program (Food for Heart Program) consisting of a brief dietary assessment and three 5- to 10-minute dietary counseling sessions given by the primary care clinician, referral to a local dietitian if the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) remained elevated at 4-month follow-up, and a prompt for the clinician to consider lipid-lowering medication based on the LDL-C at 7-month follow-up.
Changes in total and LDL cholesterol at 4-month follow-up and averaged over a 1-year follow-up period (4-, 7-, and 12-month follow-up).
At 4-month follow-up, total cholesterol decreased 0.33 mmol/L (12.6 mg/dL) in the intervention group and 0.21 mmol/L (8.3 mg/dL) in the control group: the difference was 0.11 mmol/L (4.2 mg/dL) (90% confidence interval [CI], -0.02 to 0.24 mmol/L [-0.7 to 9.1 mg/dL]). The average reduction during the 1-year follow-up period was 0.09 mmol/L (3.6 mg/dL) greater in the intervention group (90% CI, -0.01 to 0.19 mmol/L [-0.3 to 7.5 mg/dL]). Eight percent of intervention patients were taking lipid-lowering medication at follow-up visits compared with 15% of control patients. In a subgroup analysis restricted to the 89% of returnees who were not taking lipid-lowering medication, the reduction in total cholesterol at 4-month follow-up was 0.14 mmol/L (5.5 mg/dL) greater in the intervention group (95% CI, 0.01 to 0.28 mmol/L [0.3 to 10.7 mg/dL]); averaged over 1 year, it was 0.14 mmol/L (5.3 mg/dL) greater (95% CI, 0.03 to 0.24 mmol/L [1.2 to 9.4 mg/dL]). Changes in LDL-C were similar.
Total cholesterol and LDL-C decreased more in the intervention group than in the control group. Overall, the difference in lipid reduction between groups was modest and of borderline statistical significance; among participants who did not take lipid-lowering medication during follow-up, the difference in lipid reduction between groups was larger. We conclude that primary care clinicians can be trained to give a cholesterol-lowering intervention to low-income patients that results in modest, short-term reductions in total cholesterol and LDL-C.
评估一项旨在促进初级保健临床医生管理高胆固醇血症的降胆固醇干预措施的效果。
随机对照试验,对临床医生 - 患者组进行随机分组。
北卡罗来纳州和弗吉尼亚州的21个社区和农村健康中心。
初级保健临床医生(n = 42,71%为医生)及其招募的高胆固醇患者(n = 372)。22名临床医生被随机分配给予特殊干预(184名患者),20名给予常规护理(188名患者)。参与患者中三分之二为女性,40%为非裔美国人,11%为美洲原住民。
一个90分钟的培训教程,用于培训临床医生如何使用结构化评估和治疗方案(心脏健康饮食计划),该方案包括简短的饮食评估以及由初级保健临床医生进行的三次5至10分钟的饮食咨询,若在4个月随访时低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL - C)仍升高,则转诊至当地营养师,并且在7个月随访时提示临床医生根据LDL - C考虑使用降脂药物。
4个月随访时以及1年随访期(4、7和12个月随访)内总胆固醇和LDL胆固醇的变化。
在4个月随访时,干预组总胆固醇降低0.33 mmol/L(12.6 mg/dL),对照组降低0.21 mmol/L(8.3 mg/dL);差异为0.11 mmol/L(4.2 mg/dL)(90%置信区间[CI],-0.02至0.24 mmol/L [-0.7至9.1 mg/dL])。在1年随访期内,干预组平均降低幅度比对照组大0.09 mmol/L(3.6 mg/dL)(90% CI,-0.01至0.19 mmol/L [-0.3至7.5 mg/dL])。随访时,8%的干预组患者正在服用降脂药物,而对照组为15%。在一项仅限于89%未服用降脂药物的回访者的亚组分析中,干预组在4个月随访时总胆固醇降低幅度比对照组大0.14 mmol/L(5.5 mg/dL)(95% CI,0.01至0.28 mmol/L [0.3至10.7 mg/dL]);平均1年来看,大0.14 mmol/L(5.3 mg/dL)(95% CI,0.03至0.24 mmol/L [1.2至9.4 mg/dL])。LDL - C的变化情况类似。
干预组的总胆固醇和LDL - C降低幅度大于对照组。总体而言,两组之间的降脂差异较小且具有边缘统计学意义;在随访期间未服用降脂药物的参与者中,两组之间的降脂差异更大。我们得出结论,初级保健临床医生可以接受培训,为低收入患者提供降胆固醇干预措施,从而使总胆固醇和LDL - C在短期内实现适度降低。