Valentin L
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Malmö University Hospital, Sweden.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1997 Mar;72(1):63-72. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(96)02661-9.
To compare the capacity of transvaginal Doppler ultrasound examination with that of gray scale sonography as an aid in distinguishing benign and malignant pelvic tumors of suspected adnexal origin.
One hundred and fifty-one women scheduled for laparotomy or laparoscopic surgery because of a pelvic mass of suspected adnexal origin underwent ultrasound examination including color and spectral Doppler techniques within 8 days preceding the operation. Based on the gray scale ultrasound image, each tumor was classified as being either a unilocular cyst, a multilocular cyst, a unilocular cyst with solid parts, a multilocular cyst with solid parts or a solid tumor. Tumor vascularization was visualized with the color Doppler technique, each tumor being characterized by the color content of the scan, as rated subjectively on a visual analogue scale ('tumor color score'). Blood flow velocity waveforms were obtained by placing the Doppler gate over the colored area with the tumor. The blood flow velocity waveform with the highest time averaged maximum velocity was used to characterize the tumor . The results of gray scale imaging and Doppler ultrasound examination were compared with the histology of the specimen.
Ultrasound morphology correctly identified all the malignant tumors, with a false-positive rate of 61%; none of the 49 unilocular or multilocular cysts without solid parts was malignant, whereas 24% (24/102) of the tumors with solid components were. Among multilocular cysts with solid parts, both tumor color scores and time average maximum blood flow velocities were significantly higher in malignant than in benign tumors, but among solid tumors there was complete overlap in Doppler results between the malignant and benign subgroups. Using Doppler examination to discriminate between benign and malignant multilocular cysts with solid parts and ultrasound morphology for differentiation of the remaining tumors, all the malignancies in the study were detected with a false-positive rate of 32 or 38% depending on which Doppler variable was used.
The present technique of Doppler ultrasound examination is helpful only in the differential diagnosis of multilocular cysts with solid parts. Therefore, the degree to which Doppler examination can contribute to the differential diagnosis of pelvic tumors will depend on the proportion of multilocular cysts with solid parts in the population studied: the greater this proportion, the greater the potential of the Doppler examination to improve diagnostic accuracy.
比较经阴道多普勒超声检查与灰阶超声检查在辅助鉴别疑似附件来源的盆腔良性和恶性肿瘤方面的能力。
151名因疑似附件来源的盆腔肿块而计划进行剖腹手术或腹腔镜手术的女性在手术前8天内接受了包括彩色和频谱多普勒技术在内的超声检查。根据灰阶超声图像,每个肿瘤被分类为单房囊肿、多房囊肿、有实性部分的单房囊肿、有实性部分的多房囊肿或实性肿瘤。用彩色多普勒技术观察肿瘤血管形成情况,每个肿瘤根据扫描的颜色含量进行特征描述,在视觉模拟量表上主观评分(“肿瘤颜色评分”)。通过将多普勒取样容积置于肿瘤的彩色区域来获取血流速度波形。使用时间平均最大速度最高的血流速度波形来表征肿瘤。将灰阶成像和多普勒超声检查的结果与标本的组织学结果进行比较。
超声形态学正确识别了所有恶性肿瘤,假阳性率为61%;49个无实性部分的单房或多房囊肿均无恶性,而有实性成分的肿瘤中有24%(24/102)为恶性。在有实性部分的多房囊肿中,恶性肿瘤的肿瘤颜色评分和时间平均最大血流速度均显著高于良性肿瘤,但在实性肿瘤中,恶性和良性亚组之间的多普勒结果完全重叠。使用多普勒检查来区分有实性部分的良性和恶性多房囊肿,并使用超声形态学来区分其余肿瘤,根据所使用的多普勒变量,研究中的所有恶性肿瘤均被检测到,假阳性率为32%或38%。
目前的多普勒超声检查技术仅有助于有实性部分的多房囊肿的鉴别诊断。因此,多普勒检查对盆腔肿瘤鉴别诊断的贡献程度将取决于所研究人群中有实性部分的多房囊肿的比例:该比例越高,多普勒检查提高诊断准确性的潜力就越大。