Tzschentke T M, Schmidt W J
Zoological Institute, University of Tübingen, Department of Neuropharmacology, Germany.
Behav Brain Res. 1997 Mar;84(1-2):99-107. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(97)83329-3.
In an earlier study we showed that co-administration of the NMDA-receptor antagonist MK-801 during conditioning sessions blocks morphine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP). From this result, the question arose of whether this blockade is due to state-dependency effects induced by MK-801. Therefore, in a first experiment, animals were tested in the drugged state under which they had been conditioned. These animals did not show a CPP, thus it can be concluded that MK-801 does not make state-dependent the morphine conditioning. In the same experiment those animals receiving only morphine during conditioning sessions showed a significant CPP when tested in an undrugged state but failed to show CPP when tested after injection of MK-801 (i.e., in the drugged state). These results indicate that MK-801 not only blocks the development of morphine-induced CPP but is also able to block the expression of a conditioned response that has been acquired before. In the same experiment repeated injection of neither morphine nor MK-801 produced sensitized locomotor activity. However, a strong sensitization was observed following repeated injection of morphine plus MK-801. There was also cross-sensitization between morphine plus MK-801 and MK-801 alone but not with morphine alone, and also between morphine and MK-801, but not vice versa. In a second experiment the effects of the AMPA-receptor antagonist GYKI 52466 were examined. It was found that GYKI 52466 did not produce CPP or behavioural sensitization. Finally, in a third experiment, CPP was induced by morphine and amphetamine (animals tested in the drug-free state), and behavioural sensitization was induced by amphetamine. When animals were tested after an injection of GYKI 52466, neither the morphine- nor the amphetamine-conditioned animals showed a CPP. Likewise, challenge of sensitized animals with amphetamine plus GYKI 52466 failed to produce a sensitized response. It can be concluded, that GYKI 52466, like MK-801, can block the expression of a conditioned response, and can also block the expression of sensitized behaviour.
在早期的一项研究中,我们发现,在条件反射训练期间共同给予NMDA受体拮抗剂MK-801可阻断吗啡诱导的条件性位置偏爱(CPP)。基于这一结果,出现了这样一个问题,即这种阻断是否是由MK-801诱导的状态依赖性效应所致。因此,在第一个实验中,对动物在其接受条件反射训练时所处的药物状态下进行测试。这些动物未表现出条件性位置偏爱,因此可以得出结论,MK-801不会使吗啡条件反射产生状态依赖性。在同一实验中,那些在条件反射训练期间仅接受吗啡的动物,在非药物状态下进行测试时表现出显著的条件性位置偏爱,但在注射MK-801后(即处于药物状态下)进行测试时未表现出条件性位置偏爱。这些结果表明,MK-801不仅能阻断吗啡诱导的条件性位置偏爱的形成,还能够阻断先前已习得的条件反应的表达。在同一实验中,重复注射吗啡和MK-801均未产生运动活动敏感化。然而,重复注射吗啡加MK-801后观察到强烈的敏感化现象。吗啡加MK-801与单独的MK-801之间也存在交叉敏感化,但与单独的吗啡之间不存在交叉敏感化,吗啡与MK-801之间也存在交叉敏感化,但反之则不存在。在第二个实验中,研究了AMPA受体拮抗剂GYKI 52466的作用。发现GYKI 52466不会产生条件性位置偏爱或行为敏感化。最后,在第三个实验中,由吗啡和苯丙胺诱导条件性位置偏爱(动物在无药物状态下进行测试),由苯丙胺诱导行为敏感化。当动物在注射GYKI 52466后进行测试时,吗啡条件化动物和苯丙胺条件化动物均未表现出条件性位置偏爱。同样,用苯丙胺加GYKI 52466对敏感化动物进行激发未能产生敏感化反应。可以得出结论,与MK-801一样,GYKI 52466能够阻断条件反应的表达,也能够阻断敏感化行为的表达。