Safran C
Center for Clinical Computing, Beth Israel Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Methods Inf Med. 1995 Mar;34(1-2):79-84.
We examined observational data on the use of a clinical computing system in an effort to develop an empirical model of clinicians' information needs. Clinicians turn to information systems most often to review the results of diagnostic studies. After that, clinicians turn to information systems most often for communication. Bibliographic retrieval is the third most frequent reason for use, but is an order of magnitude less frequent than either results inquiry or electronic mail. Secondary retrieval of aggregate data from a clinical database is two orders of magnitude less common than primary retrieval. In a study at our hospital, clinicians gained access to an information resource during 16% of all general medical visits of patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection while the patient was present. Insofar as our narrow focus on the primary care of HIV infection models the larger context of clinical medicine, clinicians are most often looking at information relating to therapeutics. Whatever knowledge structures are adopted, they must accommodate this observed need for therapeutic information.
我们检查了关于临床计算系统使用情况的观测数据,以努力建立一个关于临床医生信息需求的实证模型。临床医生最常使用信息系统来查看诊断研究结果。在此之后,临床医生最常使用信息系统进行交流。书目检索是使用信息系统的第三大常见原因,但比结果查询或电子邮件的使用频率低一个数量级。从临床数据库进行聚合数据的二次检索比一次检索的频率低两个数量级。在我们医院的一项研究中,在人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染患者的所有普通医疗就诊中,有16%的就诊期间临床医生在患者在场时能够访问信息资源。就我们对HIV感染初级护理的狭隘关注代表了临床医学的更大背景而言,临床医生最常查看与治疗相关的信息。无论采用何种知识结构,它们都必须适应这种观察到的对治疗信息的需求。