Heisel A, Jung J, Rippl E, Fries R, Stopp M, Fröhlig G, Schieffer H, Ozbek C
Medizinische Universitäts, Poliklinik Innere Medizin III, Homburg/Saar.
Z Kardiol. 1996 Dec;85(12):943-8.
Between January and September 1995, 54 consecutive patients (male: 34, age: 66 +/- 10 years) with symptomatic chronic atrial fibrillation (median duration: 4.5 months) were referred for external electrical cardioversion to our hospital. Mean left atrial diameter was 49 +/- 9 mm, heart disease was apparent in 81%. All patients were under antiarrhythmic drugs (class III: 85%). In 49 patients (91%) sinus rhythm was achieved. In five patients atrial fibrillation persisted after delivery of 360 Joules. These five patients were characterized by a significantly higher body weight in comparison to patients with successful external cardioversion. All five patients underwent low energy internal cardioversion the following day: biphasic R-wave synchronous shocks were delivered through catheters positioned in the right atrium and the coronary sinus using stepwise increased energy levels. Internal cardioversion was successful in all patients resistant to external cardioversion: stable sinus rhythm was established at a mean energy level of 13 +/- 6.7 Joules. No complications were observed. During the follow-up, each patient revealed a relapse of symptomatic atrial fibrillation within 2 weeks after internal cardioversion despite antiarrhythmic therapy, whereas only 16 patients (33%) lost sinus rhythm during the same period of time after external cardioversion (p < 0.01). During a mean follow-up of 283 +/- 72 days 21 patients (43%) preserved stable sinus rhythm after external cardioversion. Internal low energy cardioversion seems to be effective and safe in conversion of chronic atrial fibrillation resistant to external cardioversion. The clinical value of this invasive, time- and material-consuming therapy seems to be limited in this setting because of the high early relapse-rate in the investigated patient population. Further clinical studies in a larger cohort of patients are necessary.
1995年1月至9月期间,54例连续的有症状慢性房颤患者(男性34例,年龄66±10岁,中位病程:4.5个月)因外部电复律被转诊至我院。平均左房直径为49±9mm,81%患者有明显心脏病。所有患者均接受抗心律失常药物治疗(Ⅲ类:85%)。49例患者(91%)成功转为窦性心律。5例患者在给予360焦耳能量后房颤仍持续。与成功进行外部电复律的患者相比,这5例患者体重明显更高。次日,所有5例患者均接受了低能量内部电复律:通过置于右心房和冠状窦的导管,采用逐步增加的能量水平进行双相R波同步电击。内部电复律对所有抵抗外部电复律的患者均成功:平均能量水平13±6.7焦耳时建立了稳定的窦性心律。未观察到并发症。随访期间,尽管进行了抗心律失常治疗,但内部电复律后2周内每位患者均出现有症状房颤复发,而外部电复律后同期只有16例患者(33%)失去窦性心律(p<0.01)。在平均283±72天的随访期间,21例患者(43%)外部电复律后维持稳定窦性心律。内部低能量电复律对于抵抗外部电复律的慢性房颤转复似乎有效且安全。由于所研究患者群体早期复发率高,这种侵入性、耗时且耗材的治疗方法在这种情况下的临床价值似乎有限。有必要在更大的患者队列中进行进一步的临床研究。