Boriani Giuseppe, Valzania Cinzia, Biffi Mauro, Corazza Ivan, Camanini Claudia, Martignani Cristian, Bacchi Letizia, Zannoli Romano, Branzi Angelo
Institute of Cardiology, University of Bologna, Policlinico S. Orsola via Massarenti n 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Int J Cardiol. 2004 Jun;95(2-3):245-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2003.05.022.
The effects of atrial internal cardioversion on QT interval and QT dispersion (parameters associated with increased risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias) are unknown. We investigated changes in QT interval, QTc and QT dispersion immediately after shock delivery for internal cardioversion in patients with chronic persistent atrial fibrillation.
Twenty-two patients with chronic persistent atrial fibrillation (mean duration, 17+/-23 months) underwent transvenous low-energy internal atrial cardioversion with a step-up protocol of shocks delivered between catheters in the right atrium and coronary sinus. (successful shock, 7.2+/-4.2 J). RR interval, QT interval, QTc interval, QT dispersion, and QTc dispersion were all measured on three consecutive beats (at 75 mm/s on at least 9 of 12 leads) and then averaged both before and after (1) the last unsuccessful shock, and (2) sinus rhythm restoration.
All parameters remained similar in the minute before and after the last unsuccessful shock. At 1 min after the successful shock, abrupt increases in QT dispersion (+43.8% vs. pre-shock; P<0.001 at least significant difference analysis) and QTc dispersion (+30.0%; P<0.05) were observed, followed by a gradual return to pre-shock values at 15 min.
These findings strongly suggest the likely existence of a brief period of increased electrical vulnerability immediately after restoration of sinus rhythm by internal cardioversion. Particular caution should therefore be applied whenever class III antiarrhythmic drugs are administered immediately after successful internal atrial cardioversion.
心房内复律对QT间期和QT离散度(与室性快速性心律失常风险增加相关的参数)的影响尚不清楚。我们研究了慢性持续性房颤患者进行心房内复律电击后即刻QT间期、校正QT间期(QTc)和QT离散度的变化。
22例慢性持续性房颤患者(平均病程17±23个月)接受经静脉低能量心房内复律,采用逐步增加电击能量的方案,在右心房和冠状窦的导管之间进行电击。(成功电击能量为7.2±4.2焦耳)。RR间期、QT间期、QTc间期、QT离散度和QTc离散度均在连续三个心动周期上测量(至少12个导联中的9个导联,速度为75mm/s),然后在(1)最后一次未成功电击前和后以及(2)窦性心律恢复前后进行平均。
最后一次未成功电击前后1分钟内,所有参数均保持相似。成功电击后1分钟,观察到QT离散度突然增加(与电击前相比增加43.8%;至少显著差异分析时P<0.001)和QTc离散度增加(增加30.0%;P<0.05),随后在15分钟时逐渐恢复到电击前值。
这些发现强烈提示,心房内复律恢复窦性心律后即刻可能存在短暂的电易损性增加期。因此,在成功进行心房内复律后立即使用Ⅲ类抗心律失常药物时应格外谨慎。