• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

鸟巢式下腔静脉滤器:单中心经验回顾

The Bird's Nest inferior vena caval filter: review of a single-center experience.

作者信息

Wojtowycz M M, Stoehr T, Crummy A B, McDermott J C, Sproat I A

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison 53792, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1997 Mar-Apr;8(2):171-9. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(97)70535-9.

DOI:10.1016/s1051-0443(97)70535-9
PMID:9083979
Abstract

PURPOSE

To examine a large single-center experience with Bird's Nest vena caval filters for indications, clinically evident recurrent thromboembolic disease, and other filter-related complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

During a 6-year period, 308 patients underwent percutaneous placement of an inferior vena caval filter. The 267 patients who received a Bird's Nest filter are the subject of this retrospective review. The series included 162 men and 105 women who ranged in age from 16 to 88 years (mean, 57.1 +/- 17.0 standard deviation).

RESULTS

Indications for filter placement included contraindication to anticoagulation (n = 141), complication of anticoagulation (n = 23), failure of anticoagulation (n = 30), failure of previously placed filter (n = 1), and prophylaxis (n = 82). Ten patients had more than one indication. Acute lower extremity deep venous thrombosis was confirmed in 133 patients, pulmonary embolism (PE) was found in 44 patients, and both were positively diagnosed in 37 other patients. Fifty-three patients had no documented acute thromboembolic disease at the time of insertion. Mean follow-up was 13 months. Thirty-day mortality was 9.7%, including one death from recurrent PE and one major puncture-site bleeding episode that may have contributed to death. Recurrent PE was found at radionuclide scanning or autopsy in three patients (1.1%), whereas another eight patients (3.0%) had suspected recurrent PE without confirmatory studies. Eight patients (3.0%) developed early venous access site thrombosis, including two who progressed to phlegmasia cerulea dolens with fatal complications. Significant nonthromboembolic problems were encountered in 1.9% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The Bird's Nest filter is a safe and effective device for patients with complicated venous thromboembolic disease.

摘要

目的

探讨使用鸟巢式腔静脉滤器的大型单中心经验,包括其适应证、临床明显的复发性血栓栓塞性疾病以及其他与滤器相关的并发症。

材料与方法

在6年期间,308例患者接受了经皮置入下腔静脉滤器。本回顾性研究的对象是267例接受鸟巢式滤器的患者。该系列包括162例男性和105例女性,年龄范围为16至88岁(平均57.1±17.0标准差)。

结果

滤器置入的适应证包括抗凝禁忌证(n = 141)、抗凝并发症(n = 23)、抗凝失败(n = 30)、先前置入滤器失败(n = 1)以及预防(n = 82)。10例患者有不止一项适应证。133例患者确诊为急性下肢深静脉血栓形成,44例患者发现肺栓塞(PE),另有37例患者两者均被阳性诊断。53例患者在置入时无记录的急性血栓栓塞性疾病。平均随访时间为13个月。30天死亡率为9.7%,包括1例死于复发性PE和1例可能导致死亡的严重穿刺部位出血事件。3例患者(1.1%)在放射性核素扫描或尸检时发现复发性PE,而另外8例患者(3.0%)疑似复发性PE但未经证实。8例患者(3.0%)发生早期静脉入路部位血栓形成,其中2例进展为股青肿并伴有致命并发症。1.9%的患者出现了严重的非血栓栓塞性问题。

结论

对于患有复杂静脉血栓栓塞性疾病的患者,鸟巢式滤器是一种安全有效的装置。

相似文献

1
The Bird's Nest inferior vena caval filter: review of a single-center experience.鸟巢式下腔静脉滤器:单中心经验回顾
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1997 Mar-Apr;8(2):171-9. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(97)70535-9.
2
Follow-up after insertion of Bird's Nest inferior vena caval filters.鸟巢式下腔静脉滤器植入后的随访
Can Assoc Radiol J. 1996 Jun;47(3):189-94.
3
Suprarenal inferior vena cava filters: a 20-year single-center experience.肾上腺下腔静脉滤器:一项为期20年的单中心经验。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008 Jul;19(7):1041-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2008.03.026. Epub 2008 May 27.
4
Phlegmasia complicating prophylactic percutaneous inferior vena caval interruption: a word of caution.并发预防性经皮腔静脉中断术的血栓形成:需谨慎对待
J Vasc Surg. 1995 Nov;22(5):606-11. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(95)70047-1.
5
Vena caval occlusion after bird's nest filter placement.鸟巢式滤器置入术后腔静脉闭塞
Am J Surg. 1998 Dec;176(6):598-600. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00285-2.
6
Clinical follow-up of patients with percutaneously inserted inferior vena caval filters.
Australas Radiol. 1995 Aug;39(3):233-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1673.1995.tb00282.x.
7
Early and late results after Bird's Nest filter placement in the inferior vena cava: clinical and duplex ultrasound follow up.
Aust N Z J Surg. 1994 Feb;64(2):106-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1994.tb02154.x.
8
Suprarenal vena caval filter placement: follow-up of four filter types in 22 patients.肾上腺腔静脉滤器置入:22例患者四种滤器类型的随访
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1998 Jul-Aug;9(4):588-93. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(98)70327-6.
9
Early duplex scan evaluation of four vena caval interruption devices.四种腔静脉阻断装置的早期双功超声扫描评估
J Vasc Surg. 1996 Nov;24(5):809-18. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(96)70017-4.
10
Comparative efficacy and complications of vena caval filters.腔静脉滤器的比较疗效与并发症
J Vasc Surg. 1995 Feb;21(2):235-45; discussion 245-6. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(95)70265-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Complications of inferior vena caval filters.下腔静脉滤器的并发症。
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2006 Jun;23(2):150-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-941445.
2
Cost-effectiveness of the bird's nest filter for preventing pulmonary embolism among patients with malignant brain tumors and deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremities.
Support Care Cancer. 2003 Dec;11(12):795-9. doi: 10.1007/s00520-003-0520-2. Epub 2003 Sep 13.