Ohashi J
Department of Ergonomics, Kyushu University of Design Sciences, Fukuoka, Japan.
Appl Human Sci. 1997 Jan;16(1):19-27. doi: 10.2114/jpa.16.19.
Relations between surface electromyogram (EMG) and fatigue sensation was compared between the first fatiguing contraction and the following contractions with insufficient rests. Six male subjects performed static contractions of the elbow flexors at 8 and 13% MVC with the forearm semipronated and at 13% MVC with the forearm supinated. Contractions were repeated 6 (13% MVC) or (8% MVC) times (C1, C2, C3, C4, C5, C6) with rests of 5 min (13% MVC) or 10 min (8% MVC). During the contractions the subjects reported values of rated fatigue sensation (VRFS) whose scale was from 0.0 (no fatigue sensation) to 4.0 (apparent pain and moderate severity) at every 30 sec. C1 ended between 3.5 and 4.0 of VRFS or at 18 min (13% MVC) or 20 min (8% MVC) of contracting time. C2-C5 ended when fatigue sensation became that at the end of C1 or 5 min had passed. Bipolar and monopolar surface EMG was recorded from 6 synergists of elbow flexors. Mean amplitude (AEMG) and relative power below 22Hz (RPWL20) were calculated. Though AEMGs were positively correlated with VRFSs in C1, the correlations were often obscure in C2-C6. Most AEMGs at the same VRFS were larger in C2-C6 than in C1. AEMGs at the start of C2-C6 were sometimes larger than those at the end of C1. RPWL20s of monopolar EMG positively correlated with VRFSs. The RPWL20 correlations were often reserved in all contractions. The increases of AEMGs in C2-C6 at the same VRFS cannot be explained by the migration of the activities among synergists, since the increases in AEMGs were seen in most synergists simultaneously. The compensation of the failure of muscle contractibility were not the only cause of the increases in the AEMGs during fatiguing contractions. The compression of EMG spectrum towards lower frequencies was usable to estimate the change of fatigue sensation.
比较了首次疲劳性收缩与后续休息不足的收缩过程中,表面肌电图(EMG)与疲劳感觉之间的关系。六名男性受试者在肘关节半旋前位以8%和13%最大随意收缩(MVC)进行屈肘静态收缩,以及在肘关节旋前位以13%MVC进行屈肘静态收缩。收缩重复6次(13%MVC)或8次(8%MVC)(C1、C2、C3、C4、C5、C6),休息时间分别为5分钟(13%MVC)或10分钟(8%MVC)。在收缩过程中,受试者每30秒报告一次疲劳感觉评分值(VRFS),评分范围为0.0(无疲劳感觉)至4.0(明显疼痛且程度适中)。C1在VRFS达到3.5至4.0之间或收缩18分钟(13%MVC)或20分钟(8%MVC)时结束。C2 - C5在疲劳感觉达到C1结束时的水平或经过5分钟时结束。从6块屈肘协同肌记录双极和单极表面肌电图。计算平均振幅(AEMG)和22Hz以下的相对功率(RPWL20)。虽然在C1中AEMG与VRFS呈正相关,但在C2 - C6中这种相关性常常不明显。在相同VRFS时,C2 - C6中的大多数AEMG比C1中的大。C2 - C6开始时的AEMG有时比C1结束时的大。单极肌电图的RPWL20与VRFS呈正相关。在所有收缩过程中,RPWL20的相关性常常得以保留。在相同VRFS时,C2 - C6中AEMG的增加不能用协同肌之间活动的迁移来解释,因为大多数协同肌同时出现了AEMG的增加。肌肉收缩能力下降的补偿并非疲劳性收缩过程中AEMG增加的唯一原因。肌电图频谱向低频的压缩可用于估计疲劳感觉的变化。