Leischik R, Rose J, Caspari G, Skyschally A, Heusch G, Erbel R
Cardiological Department, University Clinic Essen.
Herz. 1997 Feb;22(1):40-50. doi: 10.1007/BF03044569.
It has been suggested that the myocardial perfusion can be qualitatively and quantitatively assessed by different ultrasound contrast techniques. It has been reported that the intracoronary or intraaortic administration of the ultrasound contrast agents can be used to visualize perfusion defects or to analyze the coronary flow reserve. The perfusion analysis after intracoronary injection of ultrasound contrast agents seems to be established, but there are a lot of open questions. A topographic (qualitative) perfusion analysis with visualization of perfusion defects and perfusion areas or analysis of collaterals has been demonstrated. A quantitative analysis of myocardial blood flow has been described but the existing studies are inconsistent. It is not known which parameters of the contrast wash-out curves should be used for perfusion analysis and if the Stewart-Hamilton curve analysis can be transferred to all ultrasound contrast agents as a model for quantitative myocardial blood flow assessment. The development of the transpulmonary contrast agents for echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular cavity has the impact for myocardial perfusion imaging. The increase of myocardial intensity does not mean that a qualitative or quantitative perfusion analysis can be clinically used. In this field we have to differentiate between the possibilities of qualitative discrimination of perfusion defects and quantitative perfusion (myocardial blood flow) analysis. The different scanning conditions, the poor transthoracic ultrasound window and insufficient enhancement of the myocardial intensity make it problematic to quantify the myocardial perfusion. At the moment myocardial intensity will be increased after intravenous injection of transpulmonary contrast agents, but the value for perfusion analysis has not been shown. New ultrasound technologies such as second harmonic imaging, power-mode and raw data analysis have to show the clinical importance of these techniques for perfusion analysis in daily clinical routine. The open questions of the perfusion analysis by contrast echocardiography will be discussed in this review article.
有人提出,可以通过不同的超声造影技术对心肌灌注进行定性和定量评估。据报道,冠状动脉内或主动脉内注射超声造影剂可用于观察灌注缺损或分析冠状动脉血流储备。冠状动脉内注射超声造影剂后的灌注分析似乎已经确立,但仍有许多未解决的问题。已经证实了一种地形学(定性)灌注分析,可观察灌注缺损和灌注区域或分析侧支循环。已经描述了心肌血流的定量分析,但现有研究结果并不一致。目前尚不清楚造影剂洗脱曲线的哪些参数应用于灌注分析,以及Stewart-Hamilton曲线分析是否可以作为定量心肌血流评估的模型应用于所有超声造影剂。用于超声心动图评估左心室腔的经肺造影剂的开发对心肌灌注成像有影响。心肌强度的增加并不意味着定性或定量灌注分析可在临床上应用。在这个领域,我们必须区分灌注缺损的定性鉴别和定量灌注(心肌血流)分析的可能性。不同的扫描条件、较差的经胸超声窗以及心肌强度增强不足使得心肌灌注定量分析存在问题。目前,静脉注射经肺造影剂后心肌强度会增加,但尚未显示其在灌注分析中的价值。新的超声技术,如二次谐波成像、功率模式和原始数据分析,必须在日常临床实践中显示这些技术对灌注分析的临床重要性。本文将讨论超声造影心动图灌注分析中存在的未解决问题。