• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

尿细胞学检查:一种未得到充分利用的诊断急性肾移植排斥反应的方法。

Urine cytology: an underused method to diagnose acute renal allograft rejection.

作者信息

Corey H E

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Nephrol. 1997 Apr;11(2):226-30. doi: 10.1007/s004670050269.

DOI:10.1007/s004670050269
PMID:9090673
Abstract

In children, the early detection and accurate diagnosis of acute renal allograft rejection (AR) may be difficult. A delay in the diagnosis and treatment of AR might engender a poor outcome. Core needle biopsy is diagnostic but invasive. However, only a few less-invasive means to diagnose AR are sufficiently accurate to warrant their routine use. One such method is urine cytology. Investigators have demonstrated in more than 800 patients that urine cytology is simple and reliable for diagnosing graft failure. These observations may be important for children, for whom a non-invasive, accurate, and easily repeated indicator of AR may be particularly useful. While not a substitute for transplant biopsy, urine cytology may reduce diagnostic uncertainty and indicate the need for core needle sampling in a timely manner.

摘要

在儿童中,急性肾移植排斥反应(AR)的早期检测和准确诊断可能具有挑战性。AR诊断和治疗的延迟可能会导致不良后果。核心针吸活检具有诊断价值,但属于侵入性操作。然而,用于诊断AR的侵入性较小的方法中,只有少数几种足够准确,值得常规使用。尿细胞学检查就是其中一种方法。研究人员在800多名患者中证明,尿细胞学检查对于诊断移植失败简单且可靠。这些观察结果对于儿童可能很重要,因为对于他们来说,一种非侵入性、准确且易于重复的AR指标可能特别有用。虽然尿细胞学检查不能替代移植活检,但它可以减少诊断的不确定性,并及时表明进行核心针吸采样的必要性。

相似文献

1
Urine cytology: an underused method to diagnose acute renal allograft rejection.尿细胞学检查:一种未得到充分利用的诊断急性肾移植排斥反应的方法。
Pediatr Nephrol. 1997 Apr;11(2):226-30. doi: 10.1007/s004670050269.
2
The differentiation of acute renal allograft rejection and cyclosporine nephrotoxicity by simple urine cytology.通过简单的尿液细胞学检查鉴别急性肾移植排斥反应和环孢素肾毒性。
Transplant Proc. 1987 Feb;19(1 Pt 2):1785-6.
3
[Value of urinary cytology findings in the diagnosis of acute renal graft rejection].[尿细胞学检查结果在急性肾移植排斥反应诊断中的价值]
Vojnosanit Pregl. 2003 Jan-Feb;60(1):35-41. doi: 10.2298/vsp0301035t.
4
Non-invasive diagnosis of acute rejection in renal transplant patients using mass spectrometry of urine samples - a multicentre phase 3 diagnostic accuracy study.使用尿样质谱法对肾移植患者急性排斥反应进行无创诊断——一项多中心3期诊断准确性研究。
BMC Nephrol. 2015 Sep 15;16:153. doi: 10.1186/s12882-015-0146-x.
5
Urine immunocytology as a noninvasive diagnostic tool for acute kidney rejection: a single center experience.尿免疫细胞学作为急性肾移植排斥反应的非侵入性诊断工具:单中心经验
Coll Antropol. 2010 Mar;34(1):63-7.
6
Urine cytology and urine flow cytometry in renal transplantation--a prospective double blind study.肾移植中的尿细胞学检查和尿流式细胞术——一项前瞻性双盲研究。
Transplantation. 1995 Feb 27;59(4):495-500.
7
Comparison of urine cytology versus fine needle aspiration cytology in monitoring renal allograft dysfunction.
Proc Eur Dial Transplant Assoc. 1983;19:495-9.
8
Subclinical rejection--a potential surrogate marker for chronic rejection--may be diagnosed by protocol biopsy or urine spectroscopy.亚临床排斥反应——慢性排斥反应的一种潜在替代标志物——可通过常规活检或尿液光谱分析来诊断。
Ann Transplant. 2000;5(2):44-9.
9
Urine cytology and the diagnosis of renal allograft rejection. I. Studies using conventional staining.
Acta Cytol. 1997 Nov-Dec;41(6):1732-41. doi: 10.1159/000333177.
10
[Noninvasive diagnostic and predictive value in renal transplant recipients with acute rejection by measurement of urine Fractalkine].[通过检测尿趋化因子对肾移植急性排斥受者的无创诊断及预测价值]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2017 Jan 10;97(2):92-98. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2017.02.003.

引用本文的文献

1
STXBP3 and GOT2 predict immunological activity in acute allograft rejection.STXBP3 和 GOT2 可预测急性移植物排斥反应中的免疫活性。
Front Immunol. 2022 Dec 1;13:1025681. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1025681. eCollection 2022.