Abduljawad K A, Langley R W, Bradshaw C M, Szabadi E
Department of Psychiatry, University of Nottingham, UK.
J Psychopharmacol. 1997;11(1):29-34. doi: 10.1177/026988119701100110.
This experiment examined the effects of two sedative/anxiolytic drugs, diazepam and clonidine, on the eyeblink component of the acoustic startle response in healthy volunteers. Twelve males (18-30 years), screened for normal hearing thresholds, participated in three sessions in which they received oral doses of placebo, diazepam 10mg and clonidine 200 microg according to a balanced double-blind protocol. Thirty-minute electromyographic recordings from the orbicularis oculi muscle of the right eye were carried out 120 min after ingestion of clonidine and 60 min after ingestion of diazepam. Subjects received 36 40-msec sound pulses (115 dB), separated by variable intervals (mean 25 sec); in 24 of the trials the pulse was preceded by a 40-msec prepulse (75 dB in 12 trials and 85 dB in 12 trials; prepulse-pulse interval, 120 msec). The amplitude of the startle response was significantly reduced both by diazepam (mean+/-SEM: -43.9+/-7.4%) and by clonidine (-75.7+/-4.7%). Under the placebo condition, the 75 and 85dB prepulses inhibited the startle response by 38.6+/-6.5 and 70.3+/-2.9%, respectively. Neither drug significantly altered the degree of prepulse inhibition. Both drugs reduced self-rated alertness; clonidine reduced systolic blood pressure and salivation. The results confirm the suppressant effect of clonidine on the startle response and show a qualitatively similar effect of diazepam; the results also demonstrate the insensitivity of prepulse inhibition of the startle response to doses of sedative drugs that are sufficient to attenuate the startle response itself.
本实验研究了两种镇静/抗焦虑药物——地西泮和可乐定,对健康志愿者听觉惊吓反应中眨眼成分的影响。12名年龄在18至30岁之间、听力阈值正常的男性,按照平衡双盲方案,参加了三个阶段的实验,分别口服安慰剂、10毫克地西泮和200微克可乐定。在摄入可乐定120分钟后和摄入地西泮60分钟后,对右眼眼轮匝肌进行30分钟的肌电图记录。受试者接受36次40毫秒的声脉冲(115分贝),脉冲间隔可变(平均25秒);在24次试验中,脉冲前有一个40毫秒的预脉冲(12次试验为75分贝,12次试验为85分贝;预脉冲-脉冲间隔为120毫秒)。地西泮(均值±标准误:-43.9±7.4%)和可乐定(-75.7±4.7%)均显著降低了惊吓反应的幅度。在安慰剂条件下,75分贝和85分贝的预脉冲分别抑制惊吓反应38.6±6.5%和70.3±2.9%。两种药物均未显著改变预脉冲抑制的程度。两种药物都降低了自我评定的警觉性;可乐定降低了收缩压和唾液分泌。结果证实了可乐定对惊吓反应的抑制作用,且地西泮有定性相似的作用;结果还表明,足以减弱惊吓反应本身的镇静药物剂量,对惊吓反应的预脉冲抑制不敏感。