Phillips M A, Langley R W, Bradshaw C M, Szabadi E
Division of Psychiatry, University of Nottingham, UK.
J Psychopharmacol. 2000 Mar;14(1):40-5. doi: 10.1177/026988110001400105.
Both the acoustic startle (eyeblink) response and the N1/P2 complex of the auditory evoked potential can be suppressed by presentation of a brief low-intensity stimulus 30-500 ms before the 'startle-eliciting' stimulus ('prepulse inhibition', PPI). We examined the effects of three antidepressants on PPI of these two responses. Fifteen males (19-30 years) participated in four weekly sessions, in which they received placebo, amitriptyline (100 mg), fluvoxamine (100 mg), and reboxetine (4 mg) (p.o.), according to a balanced double-blind design. Twenty minute simultaneous recordings of electromyographic (EMG) responses of the orbicularis oculi muscle of the right eye and vertex auditory evoked potentials were carried out 195 min after drug ingestion. Sound stimuli (1 kHz) were presented in 40 trials separated by variable intervals (mean 25 s): (1) 40 ms, 115 dB ('pulse alone', 20 trials) and (2) 40 ms, 85 dB, followed after 120 ms by 40 ms, 115 dB ('prepulse/pulse', 20 trials). Under the placebo condition, both the EMG response and the N1/P2 complex showed >50% PPI. Fluvoxamine and reboxetine did not significantly alter the amplitude or PPI of either response. Amitriptyline significantly reduced the amplitudes of both responses; it had no effect on PPI of the EMG response, but significantly attenuated PPI of the N1/P2 complex. Amitriptyline also reduced arousal, as indicated by an increase in power of low-frequency electroencephalographic waves. The results confirm the susceptibility of the N1/P2 complex to PPI. The reduction of the amplitudes of the EMG response and N1/P2 complex by amitriptyline may be related to its sedative action. The differential effect of amitriptyline on PPI of the N1/P2 complex supports the suggestion that different mechanisms may be involved in PPI of this response and PPI of the N1/P2 complex.
在“惊吓诱发”刺激(“预脉冲抑制”,PPI)前30 - 500毫秒呈现短暂的低强度刺激,可抑制听觉诱发电位的听觉惊吓(眨眼)反应和N1/P2复合波。我们研究了三种抗抑郁药对这两种反应的PPI的影响。15名男性(19 - 30岁)参加了为期四周的实验,根据平衡双盲设计,他们依次口服安慰剂、阿米替林(100毫克)、氟伏沙明(100毫克)和瑞波西汀(4毫克)。服药195分钟后,同时记录右眼眼轮匝肌的肌电图(EMG)反应和头顶听觉诱发电位20分钟。声音刺激(1千赫)以40次试验呈现,试验间隔可变(平均25秒):(1)40毫秒,115分贝(“单独脉冲”,20次试验)和(2)40毫秒,85分贝,120毫秒后接着40毫秒,115分贝(“预脉冲/脉冲”,20次试验)。在安慰剂条件下,EMG反应和N1/P2复合波均显示出>50%的PPI。氟伏沙明和瑞波西汀均未显著改变两种反应的幅度或PPI。阿米替林显著降低了两种反应的幅度;它对EMG反应的PPI没有影响,但显著减弱了N1/P2复合波的PPI。阿米替林还降低了觉醒水平,这表现为低频脑电图波功率增加。结果证实了N1/P2复合波对PPI敏感。阿米替林降低EMG反应和N1/P2复合波的幅度可能与其镇静作用有关。阿米替林对N1/P2复合波PPI的不同作用支持了这样的观点,即该反应的PPI和N1/P2复合波的PPI可能涉及不同机制。