Svoboda-Newman S M, Greenson J K, Singleton T P, Sun R, Frank T S
Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor, USA.
Diagn Mol Pathol. 1997 Apr;6(2):123-9. doi: 10.1097/00019606-199704000-00009.
The histopathologic alterations of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection of the liver overlap with those of other diseases, making interpretation of liver biopsy specimens in some cases insufficient to render a diagnosis. Although HCV infection can be confirmed by detection of circulating anti-HCV antibodies, immunocompromised liver transplant recipients are often unable to mount an immunologic response to the virus, resulting in false-negative serologic testing. We describe the comparison of reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) with histopathology, serology, and immunohistochemistry for the diagnosis of HCV. Sixty-three formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples (40 needle biopsy specimens and 23 native liver resection specimens) from 35 transplant patients were analyzed by use of a novel method of RNA extraction followed by nested PCR for HCV as well as albumin mRNA as an internal control. HCV was detected by RT-PCR in 50 of 51 (98%) paraffin sections of liver from transplant patients with circulating anti-HCV antibodies, 15 of which lacked characteristic histologic features of HCV infection. Overall, there were no false-negative results in 36 needle biopsy specimens from patients with hepatitis C infection, but three negative results were seen in end-stage cirrhotic native livers resected from HCV-infected patients. No false-positive test results were seen among 21 negative controls (10 liver samples from immunocompetent patients with abnormalities unrelated to hepatitis C and 11 liver biopsies from immunocompetent patients without histologic evidence of liver disease). In comparison, immunohistochemistry using antibody TORDJI-22 was positive for HCV in only 15 of 32 (47%) needle biopsies positive by RT-PCR. Our results indicate that RT-PCR is a more sensitive and specific method of detecting hepatitis C in routinely processed paraffin sections of formalin-fixed liver biopsy specimens than histopathologic examination or immunohistochemistry.
丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染肝脏的组织病理学改变与其他疾病的改变有重叠,这使得在某些情况下对肝活检标本的解读不足以做出诊断。虽然通过检测循环中的抗HCV抗体可以确诊HCV感染,但免疫功能低下的肝移植受者通常无法对该病毒产生免疫反应,导致血清学检测出现假阴性。我们描述了逆转录-聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)与组织病理学、血清学和免疫组织化学在诊断HCV方面的比较。对35例移植患者的63份福尔马林固定、石蜡包埋的组织样本(40份针吸活检标本和23份原位肝切除标本)进行分析,采用一种新的RNA提取方法,随后进行巢式PCR检测HCV以及作为内对照的白蛋白mRNA。在51例有循环抗HCV抗体的移植患者的肝石蜡切片中,通过RT-PCR检测到HCV的有50例(98%),其中15例缺乏HCV感染的特征性组织学特征。总体而言,36例丙型肝炎感染患者的针吸活检标本中没有假阴性结果,但在从HCV感染患者切除的终末期肝硬化原位肝脏中有3例假阴性结果。在21份阴性对照中(10份来自免疫功能正常但有与丙型肝炎无关异常的患者的肝脏样本,11份来自免疫功能正常且无肝病组织学证据的患者的肝活检样本)未见到假阳性检测结果。相比之下,使用抗体TORDJI-22的免疫组织化学在32份经RT-PCR检测为阳性的针吸活检标本中仅对15例(47%)的HCV呈阳性。我们的结果表明,对于福尔马林固定的肝活检标本常规处理的石蜡切片,RT-PCR在检测丙型肝炎方面比组织病理学检查或免疫组织化学更敏感、更特异。