Suppr超能文献

双眼视力正常和有缺陷的受试者的亮度、颜色对比敏感度及视觉诱发电位潜伏期

Luminance and color contrast sensitivity and VEP latency in subjects with normal and defective binocularity.

作者信息

Johansson B, Jakobsson P

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Linköping University, Sweden.

出版信息

Eur J Ophthalmol. 1997 Jan-Mar;7(1):82-91. doi: 10.1177/112067219700700115.

Abstract

Luminance contrast sinusoidal gratings (spatial frequencies 1, 2 and 4 cycles/degree) were compared with the corresponding color contrasting patterns (along the protan, deutan and tritan axes) to see whether they demonstrated normal binocular function in humans, and distinguished between normals and persons with defective binocularity. Contrast sensitivity and transient pattern VEP latency (on-responses) were measured in normals (n = 11, median age 36, range 12-46 years) and subjects with no stereopsis (n = 6, median age 13, range 8-38 years). The normal group had significantly higher contrast sensitivity with binocular stimulation for all patterns except tritan contrast gratings of 2 and 4 c/deg. The stereo-deficient group showed no higher binocular contrast sensitivity for any pattern. Differences between groups were significant with all gratings of 4 c/deg, and also with protan and deutan contrast gratings of 2 c/deg. In the normal group, binocular VEP latency was significantly shorter than the monocular with protan contrast gratings of 2 c/deg and tritan contrast gratings of 1 and 2 c/deg. Differences between the normal and the stereo-deficient groups were significant for all color contrast patterns of 2 c/deg; and tritan contrast gratings of 1 c/deg. We conclude that color contrast sensitivity and VEP measurements are potentially useful for demonstrating binocular function, and for separating normals from stereo-blind subjects. Color contrast patterns however are less effective than the corresponding luminance contrast patterns in evoking cortical potentials.

摘要

将亮度对比正弦光栅(空间频率为1、2和4周/度)与相应的颜色对比图案(沿红色盲、绿色盲和蓝色盲轴)进行比较,以观察它们是否能证明人类的双眼正常功能,并区分正常人和双眼功能缺陷者。对正常人(n = 11,年龄中位数36岁,范围12 - 46岁)和无立体视觉的受试者(n = 6,年龄中位数13岁,范围8 - 38岁)测量了对比敏感度和瞬态图形视觉诱发电位潜伏期(开启反应)。除了2和4周/度的蓝色盲对比光栅外,正常组在所有图案的双眼刺激下具有显著更高的对比敏感度。立体视觉缺陷组在任何图案下均未表现出更高的双眼对比敏感度。4周/度的所有光栅以及2周/度的红色盲和绿色盲对比光栅,组间差异均显著。在正常组中,对于2周/度的红色盲对比光栅以及1和2周/度的蓝色盲对比光栅,双眼视觉诱发电位潜伏期显著短于单眼。对于2周/度的所有颜色对比图案以及1周/度的蓝色盲对比光栅,正常组和立体视觉缺陷组之间的差异显著。我们得出结论,颜色对比敏感度和视觉诱发电位测量对于证明双眼功能以及区分正常人和立体视觉盲受试者可能是有用的。然而,颜色对比图案在诱发皮层电位方面比相应的亮度对比图案效果要差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验