Hohenberger P, Mendrik H, Schmidt-Peter P, Schlag P M
Abteilung für Chirurgie und Chirurgische Onkologie, Robert-Rössle-Klinik, Virchow Klinikum, Humboldt Universität, Berlin.
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd. 1996;113:229-31.
The outcome of two groups of patients treated for soft tissue sarcoma either by a "limited resection" or by a radical procedure, including reconstructive techniques to vessels and soft tissues coverage, was compared. The latter group showed a higher rate of R0 resections, prolonged time to recurrence and a significantly decreased recurrence rate. Also, fewer patients developed distant metastases. From these data all efforts to achieve a radical resection seem to be worthwhile.
比较了两组软组织肉瘤患者的治疗结果,一组采用“有限切除”,另一组采用根治性手术,后者包括血管重建技术和软组织覆盖。后一组显示R0切除率更高、复发时间延长且复发率显著降低。此外,发生远处转移的患者也更少。从这些数据来看,所有旨在实现根治性切除的努力似乎都是值得的。