Stephenson E R, Ilahi O, Koltun W A
Department of Surgery, Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, USA.
Dis Colon Rectum. 1997 Jan;40(1):112-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02055693.
Stoma creation often involves a separate laparotomy incision. Recently, laparoscopy was suggested to minimize the morbidity associated with conventional open stomal techniques. We describe and evaluate a technique of stoma creation done directly through the stoma site, avoiding both laparotomy and laparoscopy.
Charts of 36 patients who underwent attempted stoma creation using this closed technique were retrospectively reviewed.
A total of 32 patients had stomas successfully created in this fashion (closed group); although four patients failed and required laparotomy (open group), there was an overall success rate of 89 percent. Blood loss (17 +/- 5 vs. 350 +/- 130 ml; P < .001), operative time (52 +/- 8 vs. 169 +/- 35 minutes; P < 0.001), and complications (3/32 vs. 4/4; P < 0.001) favored the closed group. No factors, including diagnosis, obesity, or previous abdominal surgery were identified that contraindicated use of the closed technique.
Stomas can be safely made in a high proportion of patients without the need for laparotomy or laparoscopy. Failure of the closed technique identifies a group of patients who have a high associated operative time, blood loss, and morbidity when laparotomy is used for stoma creation and in whom laparoscopic procedures may improve results.
造口术通常需要单独做一个剖腹切口。最近,有人提出采用腹腔镜手术以尽量减少与传统开放式造口技术相关的发病率。我们描述并评估了一种直接通过造口部位进行造口术的技术,避免了剖腹术和腹腔镜手术。
回顾性分析36例尝试采用这种闭合技术进行造口术患者的病历。
共有32例患者以这种方式成功造口(闭合组);尽管有4例患者失败并需要剖腹术(开放组),但总体成功率为89%。失血情况(17±5 vs. 350±130 ml;P <.001)、手术时间(52±8 vs. 169±35分钟;P < 0.001)和并发症(3/32 vs. 4/4;P < 0.001)方面,闭合组更具优势。未发现包括诊断、肥胖或既往腹部手术等任何因素禁忌使用闭合技术。
无需剖腹术或腹腔镜手术,很大一部分患者可安全地进行造口术。闭合技术失败表明,有一组患者在采用剖腹术进行造口术时手术时间长、失血量大且发病率高,而腹腔镜手术可能会改善手术效果。