Jeremić B
Department of Oncology, Clinical-Hospital Centre, Kragujevac.
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 1996 May-Jun;124(5-6):131-4.
Intensity and severity of radiation-induced nausea and emesis depend on a number of factors including irradiation site, irradiation dose, treatment field (width and length), and age of the patients. Although less intensive than that induced by chemotherapy, during protracted courses of fractionated radiotherapy discomfort can be substantial. As early as 1953, Court-Brown [2] described characteristic symptoms after a single-fraction radiotherapy as "acute irradiation syndrome": irradiation was followed by asymptomatic period of 40-90 minutes, after that the patient experienced an acute episode of emesis, usually without preceding nausea. After a period of relative stabilization, additional episodes of emesis occurred for six hours after irradiation, decreasing its intensity with time. Danjoux et al. [5] noted a higher incidence of radiation-induced emesis after the upper half-body irradiation (UHBI) than after the lower half-body irradiation (LHBI), lack of efficacy of antiemetics administered, and similar response to emesis after the lower or the upper half-body irradiation. These results suggested that critical area was the upper abdomen. Although the exact mechanism of occurrence of radiation-induced emesis is still unknown, recent studies revealed that serotonin released from the gastrointestinal tract also produced emesis through mechanisms of involvement of 5-hydroxytriptamines (5-HT3) receptors, visceral afferent fibers and chemoreceptor trigger zone. We have, therefore, used a new 5-HT3 antagonist, ondansetron, in prevention of radiation-induced emesis in patients treated with single-fraction radiotherapy.
All patients included in the study had bone metastases treated for pain relief and in all of them, the entire or a part of the upper abdomen was enclosed in the treatment field. The patients' characteristics are given in Table 1. Patients in group I had vertebral lesions that required the central radiation field at Th8-L3 level. Patients in group II were treated with LHBI-the upper field border at crista illiaca; those in group III with UHBI-the lower field border at umbilicus, while those treated with mid-half-body irradiation had the lower field border at the floor of the pelvis. Patients in group I received 8 mg of ondansetron orally, three times a day, for 3-5 days after irradiation. Those in groups II-IV received 0.15 mg/kg of ondansetron intravenously 15 minutes before HBI, just on the day of irradiation. To verify patients' data we used a special questionnaire. Emetic episodes were defined as every emetic episode with minimal interval of 1 minute between separate episodes. Response to therapy was considered complete (no episodes within 24 hours), major response (with only 1-2 episodes), minor (3-5 episodes) and no response (more than 5 episodes of emesis or administration of additional new antiemetics).
In group I, 93% of patients had complete response within 24 hours, while 7% had major response of emesis. Regarding nausea, 89% had complete lack of nausea, while 11% had moderate nausea. In the next 5 days, 96-100% of patients had complete response or major response. At the same time, nausea was controlled in more than 80% of patients. In group II, there was a 100% response rate regarding nausea and emesis lasting for 5 days after radiation therapy. Patients in groups III and IV had also a 100% response rate regarding both nausea and vomiting. Side-effects of ondansetron administration were not observed.
The results of this pilot study showed the excellent effect of the new 5-HT3 antagonist, ondansteron, in prevention of radiation-induced nausea and emesis. They confirmed results of the other authors [9, 10, 11] that used this antiemetic in the control of radiation-induced emesis. These studies included a variety of radiotherapeutic time-dose fractionation schedules, and some of them [11] included results of the total body irradiation. (ABSTRACT TRUN
辐射诱发的恶心和呕吐的强度及严重程度取决于多种因素,包括照射部位、照射剂量、治疗野(宽度和长度)以及患者年龄。尽管其强度低于化疗诱发的恶心和呕吐,但在长时间的分次放疗过程中,不适可能相当严重。早在1953年,考特 - 布朗[2]将单次放疗后的特征性症状描述为“急性放射综合征”:照射后有40 - 90分钟的无症状期,之后患者经历急性呕吐发作,通常无恶心前驱症状。在一段相对稳定期后,照射后6小时内又会出现额外的呕吐发作,其强度随时间降低。丹茹等人[5]指出,上半身照射(UHBI)后辐射诱发呕吐的发生率高于下半身照射(LHBI),所给予的止吐药无效,且下半身或上半身照射后对呕吐的反应相似。这些结果表明关键区域是上腹部。尽管辐射诱发呕吐的确切发生机制仍不清楚,但最近的研究表明,胃肠道释放的5 - 羟色胺通过5 - 羟色胺(5 - HT3)受体、内脏传入纤维和化学感受器触发区的参与机制也会产生呕吐。因此,我们使用了一种新型5 - HT3拮抗剂昂丹司琼来预防接受单次放疗患者的辐射诱发呕吐。
纳入本研究的所有患者均因骨转移接受缓解疼痛的治疗,且他们的整个上腹部或部分上腹部被纳入治疗野。患者特征见表1。第一组患者有椎体病变,需要在胸8 - 腰3水平进行中心辐射野照射。第二组患者接受下半身照射(LHBI),上野边界在髂嵴;第三组患者接受上半身照射(UHBI),下野边界在脐部,而接受中半身照射的患者下野边界在骨盆底部。第一组患者在照射后口服8毫克昂丹司琼,每日3次,共3 - 5天。第二至四组患者在半身照射(HBI)前15分钟静脉注射0.15毫克/千克昂丹司琼,仅在照射当天。为核实患者数据,我们使用了一份特殊问卷。呕吐发作定义为每次呕吐发作,各次发作之间的最短间隔为1分钟。治疗反应被认为是完全缓解(24小时内无发作)、主要反应(仅有1 - 2次发作)、轻微反应(3 - 5次发作)和无反应(呕吐发作超过5次或使用额外的新止吐药)。
在第一组中,93%的患者在24小时内有完全缓解,而7%的患者有呕吐的主要反应。关于恶心,89%的患者完全没有恶心,而11%的患者有中度恶心。在接下来的5天里,96 - 100%的患者有完全缓解或主要反应。同时,超过80%的患者恶心得到控制。在第二组中,放疗后5天内恶心和呕吐的缓解率为100%。第三组和第四组患者的恶心和呕吐缓解率也为100%。未观察到昂丹司琼给药的副作用。
这项初步研究的结果表明,新型5 - HT3拮抗剂昂丹司琼在预防辐射诱发的恶心和呕吐方面效果极佳。它们证实了其他作者[9, 10, 11]使用这种止吐药控制辐射诱发呕吐的结果。这些研究包括了各种放射治疗的时间 - 剂量分割方案,其中一些[11]包括了全身照射的结果。(摘要截断)